[ G. R. No. 40621. August 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 40621. August 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 40621
[ G. R. No. 40621. August 11, 1934 ]
THE PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. TEOFISTA DAYRIT ET AL., DEFENDANTS, MARCELO BAUTISTA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________24th________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Pampanga________, dated the _________26th__________ day of __________September_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed. Under the provisions of Act No. 4103 a minimum penalty of eighteen months prision correcional is awarded. Costs against appellant. The costs amount to P24.00 for the collection of which the trial Judge shall proceed by summary proceedings.
It is further ordered that the said cause be remanded to the Court of First Instance.
More in SC Decisions
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-01-1344 (Formerly AM OCA No. 97-461-MTJ). September 05, 2001 ](416 Phil. 875; 99 OG No. 4, 510 (January 27, 2003))
- [ G.R. No. 194564. April 10, 2013 ](708 Phil. 607)
- [ G.R. No. 185899. December 08, 2010 ](652 Phil. 189)
- G.R. No. 188670, March 07, 2012
- G.R. No. 218461, September 14, 2021
- [ G.R. No. L-24405. August 27, 1968 ](133 Phil. 760)
- G.R. No. 198338, February 20, 2013
- G.R. No. 121365, September 14, 1999
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.