[ G. R. No. 37840. August 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37840. August 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37840
[ G. R. No. 37840. August 08, 1934 ]
REV. CIRIACO SERRANO, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. PETRA BINUEL ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Iloilo________, dated the __________30th__________ day of __________April_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees _________ from the __________the appellant_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 170757, November 28, 2011
- [ A.M. No. RTJ-92-867. August 31, 2004 ](480 Phil. 709)
- [ G.R. No. 178271. October 31, 2008 ](591 Phil. 371)
- [ A.C. No. 270. March 29, 1974 ](155 Phil. 204)
- [ G.R. No. L-29083. February 27, 1971 ](147 Phil. 736)
- [ G.R. Nos. 219986-87. September 28, 2022 ](930 Phil. 377)
- [ G.R. No. L-40150. December 19, 1980 ](189 Phil. 507)
- [ A.M. No. 93-10-1269-RTC. July 08, 1994 ](304 Phil. 170; 91 OG No. 13, 1853 (March 27, 1995))
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.