[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39180
[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]
TEODORO TALENS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ANATALIA SEVILLA AND JOSE PAYUMO, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Neuva Ecija________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, vacated and judgment is herein entered denying relief to plaintiff. No expression as to costs.
It is further ordered that __xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx__ recover from __xx______xx______xx______xx______xx__ the sum of P__xx______xx as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 155591, September 22, 2004
- G.R. No. 176830, February 11, 2014
- [ G.R. No. 73140. May 29, 1987 ](234 Phil. 558)
- G.R. No. 150824, February 04, 2008
- [ G.R. No. 168198. August 22, 2008 ](585 Phil. 134)
- [ A.M. No. MTJ-94-921. March 05, 1996 ](324 Phil. 534; 93 OG No. 18, 2775 (May 5, 1997))
- [ G.R. No. L-2130. May 30, 1949 ]
- G.R. No. 188217, July 03, 2013
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.