jurisprudence[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ] 1934-05-03

[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]

[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]

G. R. No. 39180

[ G. R. No. 39180. May 03, 1934 ]

TEODORO TALENS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ANATALIA SEVILLA AND JOSE PAYUMO, DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.

D E C I S I O N

J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT

This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________17th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;

By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Neuva Ecija________, dated the __________21st__________ day of __________November____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, vacated and judgment is herein entered denying relief to plaintiff. No expression as to costs.

It is further ordered that __xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx______xx__ recover from __xx______xx______xx______xx______xx__ the sum of P__xx______xx as costs.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.