CTA Case No. 414 (Resolution)
HEIILEPPINE seront OBTD E UANIL AAPPEALS J 3
N
WILLIAM E. JOLLIFFE. Petitioner.
- versus - C.T.A CSE W0. 414
COMMISSICNER OF CUSTOMS. Reapondont.
E X
RESOLUIION
This is a motion filed by respondent praying
for the dismissal of the petition for revlew in the
above-entitled case for failure of petitioner to
appear and prosocute the case.
Un $eptomoer 7. 1957 ar ovor *hreo years ago,
petltioner Willira E. Jolliffe filed the petition
ior roviaw in this case. Respondent filed his answer
to tho potitien for review on October 4, l957. On
July l7, l9o0, potitioner requested suspansion of the
hearing of the above-entitlod case until such time as
tho Supreme Court promulgates its cecision on the casa
of People of the Philipptnes vo. William E. Jolliffo
(G. R. No.L-9553). This Court granted petitioner's
motion.
The Supreme Court having lready cecided the case
of People of the Phtlippines vs. William E, Jolliffo.
this Court,in an order dnted Oetober 10. I959,set thi
caoe for hearing on Movomber 7, 8, 9.10 and 1l. 196
Neither petitioner nor his counsel appeared cuting
tho hearing on November 7. 1960,although froa tae re-
cords of the case (p. 42 CTA Tec.) farmal notica of
A
RESOLUTICN - C.T.A. CASE NO.414
2-
said hesriny was sarvid upon thea. Wheroupon counsol
far respondant orally covad for tho disnisaal rof this
case with costs against petitioner for failure to ap-
pear and prosacute the case. Upon advica cf this Court.
respondent redueed his motion to writing and flled the
same on November ll, l960. furnishing, by registered
mail. counsel for petitioner a copy oi said motion
During the hearing for the consiceration of the instent
motion, petitioner again failed to appear despite due
notice given to his counsel,
WHEREFORE, finding the instant motion maritcricus.
the game is heroby granted. Let the petitlon for review
in this case be, as it is hereby. dismissed for lack cf
interest sith costt ogainst petitioner.
SO CRDERED.
Manila, January 3, i96l.
Presiding AAMOT Judge
D Associnte Judge ACTAN M. WALI Zlal Isacitr Juuge TAIANG
S5
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.