[ G. R. No. 39280. May 04, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39280. May 04, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39280
[ G. R. No. 39280. May 04, 1934 ]
JOSE DE LA VIÑA Y CRUZ, APPLICANT VS. DIRECTOR OF LANDS AND DIRECTOR OF FORESTRY, OPPOSITOR.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________18th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Negros Oriental________, dated the __________23rd__________ day of __________December____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to costs in the instance.
It is further ordered that xxx__________xxx__________xxx__________ recover from xx__________xx__________ the sum of Pxx__________xx, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 185766. November 23, 2010 ](650 Phil. 292)
- [ G.R. No. 9058. December 29, 1914 ](G.R. No. 9058)
- [ G.R. Nos. 193969-193970. July 05, 2017 ](813 Phil. 73)
- A.M. No. MTJ-02-1432, September 03, 2004
- G.R. No. 173533, December 14, 2009
- [ G.R. No. L-11504. May 23, 1958 ]
- [ G.R. No. 189596. April 23, 2014 ](734 Phil. 268; 110 OG No. 50, 7610 (December 15, 2014))
- G.R. Nos. 104739-44, November 18, 1997
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.