[ G. R. No. 39276. June 08, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39276. June 08, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39276
[ G. R. No. 39276. June 08, 1934 ]
SILANG TRAFFIC CO., INC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. VICTOR SINGSON, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Cavite__________, dated the__________7th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed in all parts, with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 214312, September 05, 2018
- G.R. No. 115217, November 21, 1996
- G.R. No. 258888, April 08, 2024
- [ G.R. Nos. L-39960-61. March 05, 1984 ](213 Phil. 28; 83 OG No. 4, 294 (January 26, 1987))
- G.R. No. 183308, April 25, 2012
- G.R. No. 181146, January 26, 2011
- [ G.R. No. L-22814. August 28, 1968 ](133 Phil. 776)
- [ G.R. No. 116013. October 21, 1996 ](331 Phil. 753)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.