[ G. R. No. 37718. May 02, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37718. May 02, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37718
[ G. R. No. 37718. May 02, 1934 ]
THE GOVERNMENT OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLAND, PETITIONER VS. MARCIA ABAD ET AL., CLAIMANTS, URSULA TIANGCO Y LIMCOMPAO CLAIMANT AND APPELLANT, MARIANO BATUNGBACAL, CLAIMANT AND APPELLEE.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________14th________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Bataan________, dated the __________25th__________ day of _________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirned in all its parts, with the costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-25356. November 25, 1967 ]
- [ G.R. No. 173179. October 11, 2010 ](648 Phil. 399)
- [ G.R. No. 171972. June 08, 2011 ](666 Phil. 425)
- [ G.R. No. 45923. April 18, 1939 ](G.R. No. 45923)
- [ G.R. No. 85749. May 15, 1989 ](255 Phil. 395)
- [ G.R. Nos. 75440-43. February 14, 1989 ](252 Phil. 316)
- G.R. No. 142049, January 30, 2001
- G.R. No. 254972, August 28, 2025
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.