RMC No. 14-2025 — Clarifies certain issues pertaining to the mandatory requirements for tax credit or refund of excess/unutilized Creditable Withholding Taxes on income pursuant to Section 76(C), in relation to Sections 204(C) and 229 of the NIRC of 1997, as Amende Digest | Full Text | Annexes

BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE

Bringing In Revenues for Nation-Building Quezon City FEB"I 9"2025 DILIPINAS BAGONG

REVENUE MEMORANDUM CIRCULAR NO. 0 1 4_ - 2 0 2 5

SUBJECT Clarifies Certain Issues Pertaining to the Mandatory Reguirements for Tax Credit or Refund of Excess/Unutilized Creditable Withholding Taxes|(CWT} on Income Pursuant to Section 76(C), in relation to

Sectiohs 204(C) and 229 of the National Internal Revenue Code of 1997, as Amended (Tax Code)

TO All Internal Revenue Officials, Employees and Others Concerned

provisions of Revenue Memorandum Circular (RMC) No. 75-2024 relative to the mandatory requirements for Tax Credit Certificates or cash refund of excess/unutilized CWT on income This Circular is issued to provide clarifications and realign inconsistencies on certain

under Section 76(C), in relation to Sections 204(C) and 229 of the Tax Code.

I. Clarification to certain provisions and requirements

Q1: In the list of mandatory requirements under Annexes "A.1" for those taxpayers of going-concern status and "A.2" for taxpayers undergoing cessation or dissolution of business of RMC No. 75-2024, Annex "A.1" required original copies of duly accomplished Certificate of Creditable Tax Withheld at Source should be original or copies only. Will this result in the disallowance of the CWT (BIR Form No. 2307) whereas Annex A.2" is silent whether the said documents

if the taxpayer submitted scanned, facsimile, photocopy or a notarized or certified copy of the original or electronic document is considered duplicate only?

A1: No. In this digital era, transmission of documents such as the BIR Form No. 2307 is

REAENAA TteMRe w FLO7 6TO B s heie N not the submitted document is an original copy already moot and academic. lIncluded in the verification procedures of the processing office is the validation of the and submitted by the recipient of BIR Form No. 2307 may not necessarily be the authenticity and veracity of the claimed BIR Form No. 2307 by comparing the CWT claimed per Summary Alphalist of Withholding Agents of Income Payments Subjected to Withholding Tax at Source (SAWT) submitted by the taxpayer claimant 1604E or 1601E submitted by the withholding agents of the taxpayer-claimant. If the taxpayer-ciaimant is valid and authentic which makes the question as to whether or not limited only to the physical delivery of documents from the sender to the receiver, which could also be through digital means such as but not limited to electronic mails. facsimile, cellphones, or other emerging technologies. Hence, the copies produced with the annual or quarterly Alphalist of payees as attached in the BIR Form No. data matches. the BIR can already be assured that the BIR Form 2307 claimed by the original copy.

BIR National Office Bidg., Senator Miriam Defensor-Santiago Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City Trunkline: 8981-7000 : 8929-7676 Website: www.bir.gov.ph

In this regard and for consistency of application, the third item in Annex A.1 shall now read as: "Copies of duly accomplished Certificate of Creditable Tax Withheld at Source (BIR Form No. 2307) or Withholding Tax Remittance Return for Onerous Transfer of Real Property Other Than Capital Asset (BIR Form No. 1606), whichever is applicable, issued by the payor (withholding agent) to the payee".

Q2: If the taxpayer claimant is engaged in real estate business, should the WithhoIding Tax Remittance Return for Onerous Transfer of Real Property Other Than Capital Asset (BIR Form No. 1606) be original as required in Annex "A1"?

A2: No. The processing office is mandated to verify from the BIR database if the said

return was indeed filed by the taxpayer claimant to establish the authenticity and would suffice. veracity of the said document. A reproduction of the original copy of the said form

03: Section 76(C) of the Tax Code pertains to corporate claimants only. In case an

individual taxpayer incurred unutilized CWT and intends to refund or credit the Said excess income taxes, what will be the basis of the claim?

A3: It is confirmed that Section 76 of the Tax Code covers tax credit or refumd claims of

CORPORATIONS as defined under Section 22(B) of the Tax Code. For individuall

NAN 8 g SL07 6T "IN E taxpayers, the claim may be anchored under Section 58(E), in relation to Section 204 Of the Tax Code, to quote: XXX XXX "Sec. 58. Returns and Payment of Taxes withheld at Source.- XXX

B s 19* NO AG be withheld at source under Section 57 shall be included in the return of its E. Income of Recipient. -- Income upon which any creditable tax is required to return shall be refunded to him subject to the provisions of Section 204. xxx" recipient but the excess of the amount of tax so withheld over the tax due on his

Q4: of the Tax Code, which, consequently is for corporate taxpayers. Will a new set RMC No. 75-2024, in relation to Revenue Memorandum Order (RMO) No. 25. 2024, pertain to claims of income tax credit or refund filed under Section 76(C) of documentary requirements be required for individual taxpayer-claimants?

A4: Yes. A new set of mandatory requirements will be prescribed for individual taxpayers

58(E), in relation to Section 204 of the Tax Code. However, the general policies and for both corporate and individual taxpayer-claimants. procedures in the processing hereof pursuant to RMO No. 25-2024 remain the same who intend to claim for tax credit or refund unutilized CWT pursuant to Section guidelines in the mandatory documentary requirements in RMC No. 75-2024 and the

Q5:What is the implication to the claim of tax returns filed after filing of the income tax credit/refund claim or the issuance of the Electronic Letter of Authority (eLA), whichever comes first?

Page 2 of 3

A5: covering the same period of the claim, the taxpayer-claimant is already precluded Once the claim for income tax credit has been filed or an eLA has been issued tax credit/refund certain BIR Forms are no longer required to be submitted by the from amending the tax returns. In the existing procedures for processing of income

tax docket of the claim. Once the application for income tax credit or refund has been officially received by the processing office of the BIR and the verification process taxpayer-claimants but the processing offices are mandated to verify and produce commences, only the tax returns filed on or before the receipt of the application shall be considered in the evaluation of the claim. Should there be discrepancies, this may result in the disallowance of the portion of the claim or full denial thereto. copies of the said tax returns filed by the taxpayer to be attached to the corresponding

HI. Changes in Documentary Requirements

To effect the changes above, Annex "A.1" is hereby renumbered as Annex "A.1.1'

Annexes "A.1", "A.2" and "A.4" of RMC No. 75-2024. and Annex "A.1.2" is added as the mandatory requirements for individual taxpayer-claimant. Copies of the said Annexes are hereto attached for reference. This correspondingly amends

HII. Repealing Clause

modified or revoked accordingly. All revenue issuances and BIR Rulings inconsistent herewith are hereby amended,

IV. Effectivity

This Circular shall take effect immediately.

cnue

Y BUReAU OF NerNaN revenU ARe

HOAN

FEB 1 9 2025

BY: AdMin Unit - 2 ME3:34Pm

Page 3 of 3