[ G. R. No. 41226. August 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41226. August 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41226
[ G. R. No. 41226. August 16, 1934 ]
JUAN EVANGELISTA, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS.CANUTO TOLENTINO, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Tayabas_________, dated the _________1st__________ day of __________November_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instance against the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the plaintiff-appellee__________ recover from __________the defendants-apppellants__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 189255. June 17, 2015 ](760 Phil. 779)
- G.R. No. 224849, June 06, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 90628. February 01, 1995 ](311 Phil. 1; 91 OG No. 30, 4745 (July 24, 1995))
- [ G.R. No. 267675. May 20, 2025 ](G.R. No. 267675)
- [ G.R. No. 140848. April 25, 2002 ](431 Phil. 337)
- G.R. No. 187073, March 14, 2012
- G.R. No. 123417, June 10, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 230651. September 18, 2018 ](840 Phil. 277)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.