COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. EXCLUSIVE NETWORKS-PH, INC. formerly TRANSITION SYSTEMS PHILS. PTE LTD., INC. herein represented by MICHELLE G. MEJIA
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OFTAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY ENBANC COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL CTA EB No. 2536 (CTA Case No. 9689) REVENUE, Petitioner, Present: DEL ROSARIO, PJ, -versus - RINGPIS-LIBAN, MANAHAN, BACORRO-VILLENA, MODESTO-SAN PEDRO, REYES-FAJARDO, EXCLUSIVE NETWORKS-PH INC., CUI-DAVID, formerly TRANSITION SYSTEMS FERRER-FLORES, and PHILS. PTE LTD., INC. herein ANGELES, lL represented by MICHELLE G. MEJIA, Respondent. X--- ----- - -------- ---- -- -------------- -- -- - RESOLUTION REYES-FAJARDO,]. : For the Court's resolution is petitioner Commissioner of Internal Revenue (CIR)'s Motion for Reconsideration 1 of the Decision promulgated on July 4, 2023 (Assailed Decision), where the Court upheld the ruling of the Court of Tax Appeals Second Division (Court in Division) . Previously, the Court in Division cancelled the CIR's Formal Letter of Demand with Details of Discrepancies Demand No. 43A-B270-13 and Assessm ent Notices d ated January 23, 2017 issued against respondent Exclusive N etworks-PH, Inc., 2 representing d eficiency income tax and value-added tax for taxable year 2013 after finding that the tax investigation which resulted in the subject Assessment Notices w ere based merely on a Memorandum of Agreem ent (MOA), which w as not issued by the CIR or any duly 1 Filed on July 21, 2023. Rollo, pp. 86-94. ~ Formerly: Trans ition Systems Phils. Pte Ltd., Inc.
RESOLUTION CTA EB No. 2536 (CTA Case No. 9689) Page 2 o�3 authorized representative; thus, violative of Revenue Memorandum Order Nos. 43-903 and 29-07.4 Aggrieved, the CIR filed the instant motion on July 21, 2023, reiterating that it is standard operating procedure-thus, acceptable and valid- for revenue officers to issue a memorandum to others who will handle the case in place of those designated in the initial letter of authority.s What is important is that the audit of the taxpayer has been previously authorized by a letter of authority and that only such taxpayers may be subject to examination by revenue officers. Any revenue officers authorized to examine such taxpayers will always be doing so "pursuant" to a letter of authority.6 On August 7, 2023, respondent filed an Opposition7 to the CIR's motion. The instant motion was submitted for resolution on October 13, 2023. After a careful review of the records of the present case, the Court finds no compelling reason to reverse or modify the Assailed Decision. The instant motion raises the same arguments already passed upon and discussed at length by the Court. The CIR has not adduced any substantial argument to warrant reconsideration or modification of the Assailed Decision. It is already settled that if the issues raised in the motion for reconsideration are mere reiterations of those which have already been passed upon and, in fact, adjudged as unmeritorious by the Court, these cannot be regarded as substantial and no longer require another full-blown discussion. Any further discourse will only be unnecessary and repetitive.8 WHEREFORE, in light of the foregoing considerations, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue's Motion for Reconsideration of the Decision promulgated on July 4, 2023 is DENIED for lack of merit. 3 Amendment of Revenue Memorandum Order No. 37-90 Prescribing Revised Policy Guidelines for Examination of Returns and Issuance of Letters of Authority to Audit, September 20, 1990. ' Prescribing the Audit Policies, Guidelines and Standards at the Large Taxpayers Service, September 26, 2007. ~ s Rollo, p. 89. 6 Rollo, p. 91. ' Rollo, pp. 96-100. ' Social Justice Society (SJS) Officers, et al. v. Lim, G.R Nos. 187836 & 187916, March 10,2015.
RESOLUTION CTA EB No. 2536 (CTA Case No. 9689) Page 3 of3 SO ORDERED. ~~f.~-~~ MARIAN 1~. REY&-FAJARDO Associate Justice WE CONCUR: L.Rd~x)tfo Presiding Justice ~. .tt-~t....... -Y'-__ --- ~~....~.��L MA. BELEN M. RINGPIS-LIBAN CATHERINE T. MANAHAN Associate Justice Associate Justice t- JEAN lYIAJKI Justice ~'tbnt_ co1.~6ifG~Ff:~ES LANEE S. CUI-DAVID Associate Justice Associate Justice HENRJAGELES Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.