CTA Case No. 3224 (Resolution)
~EPUBUC 01" THE PBTLIPPINEI COURT( )\' T .\X APPE�LI QUc~ON CITY p versu �.1' 'ut:l..>;.,!J\_1 1' .... v.. ~J.LJ , !" - - .... - - .... u .. r . ~ n! i rin, �he v~ru�l tic:.m '.Jl ~o,;v..!�3 .J. t pcti i I: i r111:;i t l on l (!(.I lH!oj Jl e ."'--) I 19J3 for tb � t.�Jr ~ 1 t �1�~ c~ n l.:.l- .,, u �. ~ t a l1..: ~ ur u O.t I. t� rn l ...~.., 1 -s .;.alr~'- \ r th' cl,.i 1 involv 1 r in .l . t.l . l i....,SUciC0 of ... D. r...;cr 27 , 19 ? i!. vor ot :;ctitioncr, r�.~ t c e ....... ir g v uj~c �J.vn , ~r y u _or , o r~ i , o ion . etl ion or .c ... vi ..: b c .l i ro wit ira f1 an t 1L c�� e ... -1 ... \;.: .... .u "":c.O�� Ci C' 0 .iunilu , uUI.t: 27 1 1 � ?8
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.