[ G. R. No. 35798. May 11, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 35798. May 11, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 35798
[ G. R. No. 35798. May 11, 1934 ]
ANTERO DE LOS SANTOS, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. MACARIO RODRIGUEZ DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________21st________day of ________APRIL________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the judgment of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Rizal________, dated the __________28th__________ day of __________March____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that _________the appellees___________ recovers from __________the appellant__________ of the sum of _________P40.00_________ as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. NO. 165546. February 27, 2006 ](518 Phil. 538)
- [ G.R. No. 125334. January 28, 1998 ](349 Phil. 236)
- G.R. No. 126123, March 09, 1999
- [ G.R. No. 260650. August 08, 2023 ](945 Phil. 446)
- G.R. Nos. 240892-94, April 12, 2023
- [ G.R. No. 256633. August 22, 2022 ](928 Phil. 929)
- G.R. No. 144933, July 03, 2002
- [ G.R. No. 149610. August 20, 2004 ](480 Phil. 534)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.