CTA Case No. 1401 (Decision)
....,.. REPUR(.JC OF THE PHILIPPINES ('(1t : R.T OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY ---- - . - . .. h i .10 �f f n� ,, 0l � 1 ~. �i �n ..oun 'in 9. � O!l)~ive 0 1 te, t~ t . 1 ~� is . . ,. L.iru' lnc . ��n Pac� � c T � 1.. n �� h ,t y l " �l~� ri t1: � ~ � l i" of eo ol .- t c 't � i f :!l ial �.. u w 1. ca4 � ( li~ h . ,�� f J � ' 161
l:i.J.t ~ ' citS ~4 � J., 'i 1 �Y t t, 193' t �l!)l�6r (b). �� lt } i y .a.t: V f n n � Th f.li t"' l.t" and d iel ' el 10 th y0 over f 1 .. .. �� 16.2
... l -- � n fil nc .... c ne t 'PO t�d ..n .t�in a G I I op .t 5 of � c .' l �~ . I1 . ' v ar-el . �fi$�;, ."' I. 0. 1
�1 -- � 1� - � 71 � - n 1 .7 .~ 4, � n c n 164
i� -. - i 0 ( � ' � 165
.... ...... l � �o. 1 ol . ') L th r 11. f i �' ht N�t1Vi d it of � xclu$1on f 'tim � ti loner� � .ro �s. . nc � � an l � o llQw � a.s patt of p t, ton .t' s '"�o l � e � u je t to 11 a i n n .i it in it (l j 0 c;:l ' z sult.l 9 0 �ensyl� �" - .a. , 7t. , � � 3� () -.';. '� (j() () t 1 9 i s lo 7., 19; '! t66
167
� - T nc ud � � X� .1 � 0 n~r ,.,. 168
' . l '. .' c a � � ( �~ f!. . .. " .,. � � � 17, .) ly J 19, i �. fo low l 1 ........ c l L"'::;::::;:::::::;: ) h th l' ox c *"' U.i � itt: . 0 c I~ } of oth .. ,7 169
- .. v ju ; 0 1 1 .. 1 n 0 t c1 1 � -. 7 01 l� 17 0
-1 � 1 I cT � � � � ��� � 1 n � in � !� 171
l� 1 () 1 n c f: , 't l it.i.O X h � ate l ly n 1 om the!' d :tlv �~ th Fh 'tl y ~ .... ~ s ,, n al oc 0 n� - v w1 �n n � pi c; a h& v. {.;! . � 0 toal n� o. .t..77, 1. �� y v. � c:il �1 ,. J � f!' 197 �� � .a~ o. l~ ""' ; i /I. 1 . � Q 0 � ., � 19 \ �l I� 172
f' � l 1 - 1' � X0 ~). (;! c i $ an ne f 'I :r; in s .... t � .r� P� "�$; st h I'GCtt P.tj]; h: ill /i. { 1 CJ e n 1 . � ) ...,f. a� 173
� .. l � f 1 � f1 ()" � � c.. � c ( t t � � � .f n it: c i ... t .&1 I�ithin i 1 il ..omtni$S10 (! & &.aid ina o al 1 d at � !� 17 4
� l ,i 175
n a all 176
l � 1? ... c b in l .t n o� - r n en d f ... () ..tp � p� f1 � 1) � � � � �� n� 0 0 ' d $ s0 iu � ,&. 0 n / cl � '� / 1 i. 0 0 ' i0 c 0$ on ) n t � � � h y� c i~ 17 7
� Ol - c of i e n � .. .. .. � " � J c c ""''l � � c n � ne � 5' � d .... ~9 � ~.. l i .. 'ti ( f 0 f n �� $ i t l, �II c c .. h1 e .en l c h� f d 0 i jl t78
�l l .. y � .�. 1 � 1 � 0 s c � � 1 c � 0 � .._ l ..... -1 nl -
t � ~0 ' r, � 1 y p� ..1 � � � .. ~ 180
no v l u 1� i , � � � � C: ft j; �18t '
~1n � p t"E'S V j o nd e u� � � F~TI itG � ) ii" lly of ou ' 0 ".".. O:e ~- n n of ' �1 the t ' y I;~ c:h ... i ..il t r ur " u � � .. � � (lJ).� 6 eh l.1a.r1tteit /\c 193 � . �1 � l � -::t c . ; � L� � 1 (LX � u t % 1i in v ... ppl'ova of - 61:' l 1 Q� ". 0 t c purp xh. ) rnin a 1. to ll - na$ uj e nc t unt l ~'~fit Efin foz - � u~o t ti � .: � o�e.ratton. ~xh . L�l, e ~� rtf t h) .ia 11 n i it f 1- t r 1 8 2 il . ,...,
� t �� � l h - � � � � .. J. �- 0 n � e � ;I 18 3
ltl � ct, f� d tl Q � 1 0 xem .. o 11 f � �.t ~. ~. ( �C 1. ' Cl\ ft in � � o. 19'� ~.� \..X � L� l � 11, '"T I Q � nb ho t f v t'\ JO fl t nn~ i..,u p .rt a i zt :l'�1 1 t "�-e in :19. � .�. �e iJ1 t~ t for ~� '5� (!\ 0. ctel �.,.�..r.td .t xp. . 9 �. .. . �14 fr in '"~ l l i f.; ~ CJU � Je;ti.t.!onrot'"" opexc1tion in thE ,Jb P.P ne <ts. lte,., .i � . ... J'l lti� (j ,: 1~ . ' J.n 1'5 c a!J ell ; � 1 '.18 � . ) 1 )p �:til ifi9 .t!; "~ i 184
"-:-or 1.1 pp n oc Tax . c� z.e~: 0 l.Lf .. tl50,86 . 7 PC> t L� ' �xpen i } i l,o �r f i .u <. � flc . , n y .l.ll "" ~ nt &'" 1 tt y nc ll n fi � ' ith- u~zcn _, t ~-/~0'2/Z~.c fj� ~--~~- 185
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. AIG SHARED SERVICES CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES) [Formerly: CHARTIS TECHNOLOGY AND OPERATIONS MANAGEMENTS CORPORATION (PHILIPPINES)(CTA Case No. EB 2071)
- CTA Case No. 4283 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4283)
- PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES v. ROMMEL YNION y SALVA, (No.21 Aurora Drive Vergonville Subd. Pulang Lupa, Las Pi?as City ) (AT-LARGE ) [consol with O-314 to O-320](CTA Case No. O-313)
- SCG MARKETING PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10779)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHILIPPINE AIRLINES, INC. (PAL)(CTA Case No. EB 565)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PHIL GOLD PROCESSING REFINING CORP.,(CTA Case No. EB 1536)
- WATERFRONT PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1070)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. NIKKEN PHILIPPINES, INC.(CTA Case No. EB 1058)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.