CTA Case No. 3570 (Resolution)

llEPUBI.I C 0 ,. TBE PBILIPPINBI COURT iII� TAX APP�"-LI . ~U~ON CITY L.LJ �. o I .2\:.:tition�r , - versud ��r.t. . .o . 3570 .:..CJJ \. U Yo~U/ CO .... IS S ~0. 4}.'!"\! OLl t:I I ,. e..,l?c�n(lunt . - - - - - - - - ~ - ~ -- ~ L . ';..' i 0 1' Co110 iuer .ing that the pe t i -.1.vn .1... l.:'c t i ione r in this cas <.<oes not 'lleve ro,.Jcr ly an 1. co..Lt lc t2- l the JUrisuiction-1 fact� con titutin0 its ca~5e of action or b~~is o~ its appeal , which shoul~ es~~nti lly 'nuicat che nat�rc of the cas~ , the . llt:Cl.Sl..OnS 0~"". ~1e Collccto Cl.S tu~.18 nc. ..:ortuission r OL 'ustoms an th~ r D~ective � a~-s ot rec �~t there- .. a.w a J ..!.:ll by ..:>eti ti ner , t.1 � .mrJ:JO -..: vi �-lie ic to sl ov; to th~ Court that t r~ hac b en co! 1 li-.4 1c \ i ~h t .. procedural anu 'uris ic ional rc~uir .onts o c.he �ar if� a u CustOI.tS Co�~ r vr 1 ~est se~zure c.:t..;..,..;; c..~~ the c se may b. , ar ciculc..~r ly .... cc i ns 231 .:.n~., 2313 ther 0.1. 1 ... well s 0.1. ;;) ct' on 7 <.ula 1 0.1. cpu lie :~ct .o . 1125 1 ,.., oi: the \..-OUr OJ.: :: L r;.,.~ alu , ""''u i t .:. 1 )C rin ::J tn~t , a cr the r:ilin::.~ o rcs>oHucnt ' r:.> ,,o i 1 to uis:;ia- on ~.. .. e 71

!ZI:::JULU.... 0. C'l'. Ct).:.J .� ~0 . 35 7 J - 2- a 11~ 1 J;"'Ctl.t.io 1 for rcvi u J ckL! cd as .: � � A� .:aGe rio . 3G27 , ~ourt lLreDy resolv s o lswisn this case . .. � tnout. c.:>.... ts . SO Ql DL.t ! � vuczon ~l y , ~ay 31 , 19~ � ~~~-~'~ , /,... . .-u... 1UI.4 '72