CTA Case No. 360 (Decision)
Ut "' et', on . n � b p titi n 1 h .JI}%" f t l '0 � Lt � by l. � ot o. 2 9~ � d 11'1. .th tb 4 Iloilo Cit ... pet t . it or t :t.ssue. th �f t:t l xds ar t �. ted in t 471
� r ... .... t-: (., ....... ! 1 r. ... AX d. ~ t �.. i~t . l {. � # r i: .; C:- - .d � ,, t:' '!':(� � it. :tl ;.,.. 1"\.: 4 72 ' ��
:t1-:CI -!T r .,, ... l (::.� 1-. �.'"'� r;; . ~,.,.. l ' 4f t 1t _:Jtj~ $_ r .... 3 ... � . ' XV d 1 r:: tho .._. +y 473
c. I.":'l.' . l fi 3� t � y t- 0 ti - c � -� �l -- of 0 � nn ri u. (. � t f ..
� -- 0 t f i1 i3 t rt ,, 'I u-t t 1 � � in 1 l f ic. i t � � � 476
More in CTA Decisions
- HOTEL SPECIALIST (TAGAYTAY), INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2084)
- BENCHMARK MARKETING CORP. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2021)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. TOLEDO POWER COMPANY(CTA Case No. EB 321)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. ORO DARE LOGISTICS CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2699)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. HALLIBURTON WORLDWIDE LIMITED - PHILIPPINE BRANCH(CTA Case No. EB 3070)
- CTA Case No. 5649 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5649)
- FUTAMURA CHEMICAL CO. LTD. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8906)
- B. NEVALGA ENTERPRISES CORP. BY: BENITO B. NEVALGA v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2171)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.