[ G. R. No. 41201. August 16, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 41201. August 16, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 41201
[ G. R. No. 41201. August 16, 1934 ]
EMERICICANA JIMENEZ ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ELENA NUÑEZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
V. ALBERT, CLERK, SUPREME COURT, P.I.
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________31st________day of ________July________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Manila_________, dated the _________30th__________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without costs.
It is further ordered that __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ recover from __________xx__________ xx__________ xx__________ the sum of P__xx__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 45529. April 13, 1939 ](G.R. No. 45529)
- G.R. NO. 152430, March 22, 2007
- [ A.M. No. P-22-063 (Formerly OCA IPI NO. 18-4860-P). February 07, 2023 ](935 Phil. 496)
- [ G.R. No. 5381. March 18, 1910 ](G.R. No. 5381)
- [ Adm. Case No. 632. June 27, 1940 ]
- G.R. NO. 169643, April 13, 2007
- A.C. No. 1954, July 23, 2004
- [ G.R. No. 10427. February 14, 1916 ](G.R. No. 10427)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.