CTA Case No. 1153 (Decision)

� 5� t .. 0 0 t'

� .... .... �� I �� . . n f t i rJ ( . ft c l e0 p l +. � 0 � 0 � i

'�I � 11 - 3- lt la .o. 4 e b t d � 1. p ti i - o a 1tin f 1 t i un , Ci eul r o. ap 6 of C!r .... 1 t' � l 3 p. Th . e is n in on nd C1 cular t o. l � cti 14 of Circ lar o. th rovis� ...ns o. 1 1 Of t� in (;! l� is d. ~ nccro or eif n / 1 ;ttd n in :rt f Circul ..... ('1 . 33. eve t . at, y si n t i eul %" o. 44 h e �o. y Ci:rc 1 l" 1 3, h v l i i ~Y of h n r t e f ,t!O 1 i n ff t by ,~... th iJ handiso in (11' 0 th ci &till fo c � i 1":11: 1 r. .an � i0 lw 1 n 0 ... i of ieh - i-1 l t he i rJf portat ion (Lazaro v. Commissioner of' Customs, C.T.A. lr

� 11 ... " � 3; � � � � c . . .. 0 7 � J . � � �) 1 � ih ' 8 n 1� �� � 275