cta_decision CTA Case No. 25282528 1977-10-28

CTA Case No. 2528 (Decision)

". ' ' I.I P~ -1 8 ll~A~ Cl1Y a �� th �tl t ti n r . ... Vi� SIJ ... " � ,,j, .. c �5 0 � n� - ----------- / o I a.r/~ '0 ....... 0 0 V.:i. �, i c �Of .:. ec i 05 c. r: '\ ):' ":-� n d (.; u~ t: m� Cod i d' i n t 2 2l h~ � chl!" c ol . cLor JC �u 't .Jm!' . t' h..: ~ :t.'t. 0 r "n 'l� 1 fin Ot l , t00 ., \'.:10 �>n t l I t; .:J- r. �h es r d v, is i n in ' ' � .eci �e~n ? on� 11 ; t .A.,, n p 11 l 7� j, , f c \ i eci i n, ') tit Ma n -o �.� nc �� i it c ys nt e � -4/ ' ur rt'l. t b:t:o g h t e n t nt :.p . 1 . T - l(.": t ( c;:,ee r u n ~.,:,is � h ,; �H itt R '1~ t � y l-.' . 406, r - i th l~ ... � r �h .l 1� 71 . m n 0t , lo - t t :t l'} t wn t e in 0 t ..J ( 2) r m c ir n ��1J el t.i n. I, li~ ~n t in ,~�n i fe 0 t.' �t. n ) h 0 . ni 598

� ... � , 0� II u� �7 it �o � n 1r t - n 1 1 in e. n - 1 n t n �t ti .n � v l # 1' { � n v1 nc 1 '</ . � , ;: � nv i "' f 1. u .t .. 0i 0 i >r.. �t in 1- � u 0b r. ru t l/� Ir t., .�o .. � un ni 599

. ;, -. 52 .... ... i 0 tJ.. n .a . l . 0 ... �h f stom c� i 1 .. "" i ro (: ~� ion . i n rv c ser;, hr c n i ~ ., .i l b.r t h � t. 1 t;; i .h c1 Ofl.'l- ... tC i l ~::: t C )rnpl l bnr r; �f it n pt. c oy u u '"'if l".:U! tom� nn na man t r e 0 no m ;rtF~nt .. ( ) e c � c �� v � cyr � en c t )ilk , ~ l s N � 2203, J � c o ndr:!'l':f � I n <~: ,.. v a � c � cu m.s , o� i l � 1973 , � or :oilit 0 "C i ~t " V � .... s ! a ~ l t: i ... 11~ '" .o c r �o a �r' t'd n i !'o ... :1 rl �~n if ~ t; n �"'v n t' l1� s f n ,.,.., s; Lu . Co�.. ~ . i t 8 Pn nd i re� u r �ah..nt t "ld ~ ' '/ r t im� <: t. li fro r i n p t . l t ll l f' t ') V .tl t i~e ��t o{' ~ll t r t:i� r in tcn. ~a to l c. !JC.Cl c >) t 0 nt .. s t~ t: nt: .~ � 60 0

� - -. f i� it t lJ . h i � n n 1� � 1 1 � �0 � 601

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.