[ G. R. No. 39339. May 28, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39339. May 28, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39339
[ G. R. No. 39339. May 28, 1934 ]
MACARIO LUNA, APPLICANT AND APPELLEE, VS. EMILIO AGUINALDO, OPPOSITOR AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________11th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Cavite________, dated the __________12th__________ day of __________Januray____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed without special pronouncement as to costs.
It is further ordered that the xx__________xx__________xx__________xx__________xx___ recover from xx__________xx__________xx__________ the sum of P__xx__________xx, as to costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 258524. October 11, 2023 ](948 Phil. 400)
- [ G.R. No. 110736. December 27, 1993 ](298-A Phil. 728)
- G.R. No. 181961, December 05, 2011
- [ G.R. No. 145823. March 31, 2005 ](494 Phil. 483)
- [ G.R. No. 23281. August 10, 1967 ](G.R. No. 23281)
- [ G.R. No. 184251. March 09, 2016 ](783 Phil. 94)
- A.M. No. P-06-2152 (Formerly OCA IPI No. 04-1944-P), December 10, 2008
- [ G.R. No. L-8055. May 25, 1956 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.