[ G. R. No. 37533. May 09, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37533. May 09, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37533
[ G. R. No. 37533. May 09, 1934 ]
ALEJANDRO CABELLON, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. ARCADIO REYES ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________23rd________day of ________April________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Occidental Misamis________, dated the __________29th__________ day of __________October____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-one____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellees___________ recover from _________the appellants _________ the sum of P__40.00___, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 246565, June 10, 2020
- [ G.R. No. 170790. October 23, 2009 ](619 Phil. 286; 106 OG No. 33, 4540 (August 16, 2010))
- [ G.R. No. 237204. October 01, 2018 ](840 Phil. 782)
- [ G.R. No. L-37124. May 05, 1976 ](162 Phil. 877; 73 OG 598 (January, 1977))
- [ G.R. No. 130341. February 10, 2000 ](382 Phil. 199)
- [ G.R. No. 55912. November 26, 1986 ](230 Phil. 135)
- G.R. No. 245988, June 16, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 269085. February 19, 2026 ](G.R. No. 269085)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.