CTA Case No. 356 (Decision)
., ____ , c. r . f � ... - C ,.. I ... r u -.# n � � y. � "f c. � � � 9 . � � � . J n �y 7 IJ � � ':1.7 � 0 � ti' � t. ,. /. (4 n . o. ; 7 :10 ' n ... _ ... X (I t t no �c 50 , l� i � on j 145
.. ,
.' - f h �X c ly � h cus � i h ii X a in ce n c fo � i ti 1 ! h 0 �n t u or r t: id. J 7. in 1 c r �1 t . 1 c �T
� c. 148
/ ., -� '-, ..' l - f � c - x. 1 - of t c � 1 c iv - 1 1n tX yin it hc .An � i f �- 1 r t s ch i n 1 ./
-. y � X 0 �1 p - 0 1 �- � �� � � � � ty 150
t �1 �2 .... ��������� 1 E , 0 77.9 ' 17 ' ~ 2. ond t.x 1f J yt 0 � . cl fo r fu d f1 e Y r n n .. 0 � id f 17.o!> .46 ut no d cisi h 1
de i h"' d '1 .o 0 1 ~ f t 1c . � 1 v il- i 1 152
- ... c v t 1 1 r 0t in yr f t lie � io ' r. f e� uo - f v ic � �i at 0 153
� ( ~ c. n v nu - - l ) v i l ov. h new 1 { , � ll of � . � { 11. � .u . � � � � ll 9 � n 2 l 1. ' I lt by , c ~c cn p ov �o ic c � h 0 .. it t � h .� X 154
\. ri - i 1 � v � h ' �- 155
� 2 y � I l t f .~ i d 0 d 156
-- I � 1 u n $ - t1 th �n n hi tf ca n- h 0 \ y - 0 n i' at �p.. 1f h tl 1 vo 0 t. 1 i x- 1 oc i �T z n t ... ffi ' av 157
� - r q 1r t (! r iv t�
... �- 159
- 1 ... � 160
... 17- � - 161
- 1 ... � ... 162
1 �- - 19 ... h I o. 1 11 c;to � n� n � 19 �1 Int r a in f h1 - nh 1 ct .. 1 of d � l t x; ... 1 nu .1 r �x l .� ra l ~ fi d l ( ing
<> I> .. - n �ald .n. � ' 1 t� 1 � .i l � 1 ... n I - � >� 's � - � � ,.. - t - i � 1l f t '( 11 c0 ' � � n � tu 164
- - 1- u t . .r:!. � � l ( 1 � rn on ' !;. d r t:l 28 . 1961 .1 h h ld i 0 '/ 1 c _n of Xs t nc fi 1n fh t- 1 .r n �t n n 1 � ' � G II t h p � ls 1 c. � � � . .. 6 �� � ' ?. � to thou i r- ur. y 27. 165
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 5700 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5700)
- CAGAYAN DE ORO DOCTORS, INC., (MADONNA AND CHILD HOSPITAL) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9260)
- GREEN CROSS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE (Consolidated with CTA Case No. 9994)(CTA Case No. 9833)
- NIPPON EXPRESS PHILIPPINE CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7429)
- Sitel Philippines Corporation (formerly Clientlogic Philippines, Inc.) v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 7186)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE INTERNATIONAL OPERATIONS SA - ROHQ v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9897)
- SOUTHERN NEGROS DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 162)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. Team (PHILIPPINES) ENERGY CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 694)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.