[ G. R. No. 39240. June 12, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39240. June 12, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39240
[ G. R. No. 39240. June 12, 1934 ]
ISIDRO BALTAZAR, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ISABELO TABANGCURA ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLANTS.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________26th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Ilocos Sur__________, dated the__________27th______________ day of __________December_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs in both instance against the defendant-appellant Isabelo Tabangcura.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the defendant-appellant/Isabelo Tabangcura_________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- G.R. No. 137385, January 23, 2002
- G.R. No. 252369, February 07, 2023
- [ G.R. No. 136426. August 06, 1999 ](370 Phil. 921)
- G.R. No. 169882, September 12, 2007
- G.R. No. 141001, May 21, 2009
- A.M. No. P-09-2647, July 17, 2012
- [ G.R. No. 129070. March 16, 2001 ](407 Phil. 37)
- [ G.R. No. 22650. April 28, 1967 ](G.R. No. 22650)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.