CTA Case No. 5154 (Resolution)
REPUBL.i.O O.i" 'T1:1.B PHILIFPINBS COUKT' OJ. ' � � APPEAl c; :1 Z N c��ITY MA TLAND-SMITH L fHITbJJ. Protul~ PHJI:..lPPINE' BRANCH~ JUN 071995 - ~- Pe ..J.tlon r~ -TV - versus X- - - - . tj' f r.J Confirm' n..,. the or�dEU' �n open court on �.lune 2. 19.9r.. p t..tt.itmer�~s motion t.o ilspe11ae witl the i l �J of i t ~==r foz 1sl offeJ' of it petit� >n for z�eview on .b i t ha - been Jt::J at z f,Jct ton. B Cert; f" cat (TO, S 0 :~8 78J by 1e Bur au of lnterna l Re v Jlll& in the amo mt� o P61 � 070. 5'1 J�epre. IJ... in va ue- aeN 1np.l, t x P�"i �m. Jt: rom ccord in ~z v. 1e � the pP.tit-ion f'or 'ev��" det.m d ,)o.-.ed a1:1d t.ermi 1a tea. SO ORDTi:REfJ 339 (( n HA OET. A-s ci t
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.