CTA Case No. 3665 (Resolution)
REPUB LIC OF THE PHI LHJPI;JES C0 URT 0 F T ,o,)~ f.l.PPEAL S QUEZO i; CI TY USV ARMO UR PHA RMACE UTIC ALS , I NC. (f o r merly USV PHARMACEUTICA L ( PH I LIPPI NES ) CORPORA T IJ ~ ), Pe t it i onL..! r, - vers us - C . T. .1.\ . C I~ S E i'JD . 3665 CCli"lr�l I 5 SI 01'-J EH 0 F IfJT EH::J~ L REIJ Ei'l UE , Res p o nd e nt X- - - - - - - ------X RE S 0 L UT I UN Ac t i fl g Q n t h 8 II jv] 0 t i 0 n T0 uJ i t h d r a w Fo r RG v ie w" filed 1n the a b:JV 3 - en ti t l e d cas e~ by p et i- ti one r on Sep t em ber 20 , 1 986 in vol v ing a c .1.... a .;.Lm f:::;r r := fund of th e Bmount o f f39 L;, 280 . 00 r e pr as2nt in g o v s r - p aid ad v an c e sc l as tax , a nd th 2 r a b e ing no o bj e cti o n on the part of r es pond e nt as ;rttested by th e l atte r' s c o uns e l, ::-'aid motion is hereb y GR/4 !JTEQ . ~cco r dingly , l 8t the petition for rd V ~sw je con - siders d withdr a wn and t his c ase da o ~ed cl os s d a~d SO u~DE~E D . Qu e zon City, Met r o Ma nil s , S3p t emb 3 r 3U , 1 988 . /\ 1�1/HJTE Pr 8s ic;i 19 Ju dge RE VES F:OP.QU Hj :~ s 3 0 c :i_ 8 t 2 J u d g f:') Ju ci q:::!
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.