CTA Case No. 2466 (Decision)

Ct l .. v su "" ' 10 . ... - ... I .; thi w,:.~ call .rl n 0 o- J ;j t !" th h . 1J - ' C'U t ap ione ~von �nat h n it on r � ~ .o ar� r t 1 � t" r bt.:$ l l h l.i, �ph ne h.v t ''> 1'1'3~;.:( r-ubmi hts c ~�e fr u '1 ;-u.rt s ~n (~ �:-1 his cu ...t . � ?5 .... :roc �Y tl1" 7t .' l'lilippitl ::~ , Lt v � �'o - 602

>I -- t 603

.' -.... 1t t0 n t 0 1 n f lo�ating � ere ore � 1 ra rr

� 21+6 ' -� t I e r � nu 1 1r �� i 1 ' �� !t 1l .. h 1 rt n 1 1 1 1 1 er in 1 f 'r �� 605

� - n ft l. 1� y r: ""' c 7 c 1 69 , J � � 1- y n 0 � ep-.: xn 606

.. .. t 11 1 19 � ru . 2 ln1 'tr t1 a "'""~"''It""~ t C1 . r vtd , Co eq tio 1 o'ft tio d i t e. P - .lipp:ln � t r pondent � s nth ba t tb r Ji "' ilin t I_ of rr1v 1 1n th ~h 11 nea. ti� tio er p 1d un -r pr te t the dditio 1 w 1oh d p abl u b th arity rat r he r t tt ul ted in th o �ard xch ontr ts, b 2 1 19?21 et1tion r fil d itb r h ca or int 1'1'1 l id on 1t 1 o ev 1 t t 1! tb d 01� for nd/or x dit titi �11 tb tant p tition for 1 hi a ur on ce r 29 l912t 607

... 7 .. 1 po t1 ns u rh th C1 � t r . 291 � un ti tn f r� 1 608 � t 0 to

.' � 1 � .. ri r 11 t "' v� � 't 1 t ' n '1 et e t. 11 t 1r 609

c. ' 66 .. - cannot, ..here b1 t In �v n mit to � n eo t a t � . nd o pl usi 1 r n t tt d re u o vu e 11 t1o ui io t0 0 port d � rt1ole~ o utin 1 o,. tion r t ti i "O v ,l"t d in. o Yb.111p i.n rat n:r va1l1 ~ th ti t ion � for s..' . ti io r i . v 1v in h 1 d � � .m~rit 1 et1tio f r i th bov .. tJ. l ca i 1 ) be.r 9, 977. ua on Cit'; , ~-~_ / c1 t� � 1;r~ :�iu~~e / / I '61 0