CTA Case No. 1569 (Decision)
~EPUl'II.IC OF THE PHJLIPJ'INEI eoURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON . ClTY ..,. ,. ' ' /. ... �1 n . i 151)Q , ~ :6"'' c sus 1I ~ - -- - ----- h t f on r � 0 s for f':i!"f� ~ . t' c P<)1 \:.----. ! ,? t' ' t co 0 1' S'or su 1 .a \a1 , nc d t C. r i t o,;~dC.i .t d fr -~� Cr~ 1 ( 1.. c.' 0 �=" .r ho n- , ri nn th ,. d hc ol'i. 'a f) 1?t 1 ~0 ugn 31 , 1!'1 6 5 , p .ri od .f'r o ~T t Jy 2BB
i lust � ror r ,fund ~nd/or X C edit r . presenttn 25- of tbf! a c1t1c t $ on f"uel and 1 br1c .nt8 used by it 1.n 1 lo 1na optr tions p.u.r~u, nt to � ctio ; . t lt pu :J.1Q Aot r~~h !4 ' ' ttnum � t 4 toll:Q .t 1. On. .J-un 21t '962 tho ot . t;-! ~~94 ..63, .eov r!n . the p r1od f:ro .lfuJ.Y �1 t be ber 31 , 196t � 5i .2~~~ On Wov!':mb"r 1962, t.~b or 6,2<1+.26 co11 r ng b perlod �:r.m ., y 1 to Ju ,~� ) ( , 19 2. . r,; _3,. On Autt e 6 ., 1'9'63� sue: or J1u9ly(L,l1-t6�t1o~oDvcet'a1bn t~ . .p"'r:t�od tr � 31 ., 19 2 .. of' 1+. O.onnJ,ancuovar�yrin2g0, .196l+, tbe r�4,'91e the period .rr Janua.r1 1 to J'un~ ) u, 1963. su � 5'� !" On� n ptem r c2r5ln1 g 196'+ th nr th ~,932.96, cov :p rio<' � r July 1 t oe ber 3t, 196).. 6. l)n ~,~~ 1 31 , CE)5 t , l:. of s .;. .&.s9.fllt rr nuary 1 1 t oov rin g th per1cd lly 31, 1 96lt. o 1l � . ? � 0.. Ju"\<:' 16, 196;, th" sum �ot S? 5't 707. (l1 c er1t'lc 1 the perio .f' . :om t,:agust 1961 . FE~~bru l'f 28, 196~. 1, 8. S pt mar 27, 1966 th . sum of fl6, 135. 2t�, covering th~ period frc. ~""' � rc:b. 1 to Au,;nst 31 � 1C'65 .. The r.1rst five claims and the s vellt cl 1tn ~r t-ft.Sp~ct '\MlY d rd.ed by r soontlrmt in hiP: ~tters r~ "1v d by- p !:t1M r on th following
OJ~ISlOl . .... CTA Cl S! 'S :i ' d . ' , 167 - ' 1 Qt. ~ o .r 1 , 6 ~e o r 17 , 1 - ,. - 16, 1~ ' , v , , e ~i, 19" , \ ~ to r 21, 1( .6~ and .Ju\i' 27 , 1~6) .. r�o .tt .. n on t:h � 1 d �1 � nti c..s . 1 5 tl � G th. o he r.trt w . l vC � 6 tt1 . el i b i t "' o�n � 4 � , CTi C � 1674 � lolll t ' () �1 1 1 ool,y c �� 1 n of t!. t1- toner ith ~ �nt it r qu# t on 1 or f1v c1 1 �'e o r , 1 ' 1 , �ov 1'; t� 19. t 1) .c ~ 2 , 19\5 � 'Et . la �t rs for soon� � dcJtat on �:11 d on �~c�t. oh r 2 , 1~r4 2 ' 196 etiv 1 ni d y t on .r h 1' . d 2?, 19 ~ J t169, 1t1o,ll .. r j~ th ourt o , , 5 1 9~ tl t t ""� b '1! I 1966 t l" $ �1: 1 t th. 5!1 rti!ll t x r tu � J o t 1 .or- b� : e.- 287
�.:'' "u.CIUl'Ot � Ct1'' CASti:S , ns 1569, �16?4 a 18tt� 0 ls , lo�~1 tio 1 %mit to , .. r 0 (;') y oou ted lra Ju 14, 19$ , 1/1 t sf r . i Repu.bl:t 1ct Jo.. 1~' 5 t t.m f et�, lik ~ t l ttitX r t 10 ot p, 1fio tax p 14 on oils ua d 1n e~rteol.tu.r nd 1 tion gra t d b)' ~ ctlon 142 ot tb � T x Code, The is4liu p sent d to thi COtU!'t tor re ... .o1ution r t11 �rollowt etf �
- 1 1 .r 1 l or 1r i hy ni: Cou t 1 nt Ufh ln t , � r ,c � 38 , 15, 1 ;? i . l'li.c ..... in t 1 Cour 1 ,.., t ll � 1l+ ; i~ //' 289
� 1 1/ n nr t � trc
'I ' � a 1 0 t f .1 - ) 1 ... 1 ' r � . � ' 1 29l
1 c 1' . � 91 . ) 0 n {.'t . ch - h 292
� 1 r p 1 i, U. , 11s 1 :1 293
1 .",.'. ! th tc .. I r ftvd o1� I ' 0 1':.>�~. ) - �u 3, 294
.. 11 ( ti 0 vi v t Cl' � , n ) tk 1 r '!'1 cl i ' - t t in c ~ .. p d 0 i t r t . t., Ol' .) 29S
0 t .. t � lf ' of its stu: d . ! . h or n1 H1 ct hnt . ) t)f 1J0 t i<"' l r nd .t r t '1:' PT t r t X C dit to ~9 � 4 , �r r:r ., P .:.n \i. n .l! t (, or su;,~� 6, . 25 l ~l � Case o . or :tt~ no '15 ~ flCi fi o�1 r "'n ... t ~ ..~-~-~ ~J t. . .. , . !150~1 .. t J, g 296
More in CTA Decisions
- CTA Case No. 1426 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1426)
- CE LUZON GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7393)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. KENNETH C. PUNDANERA(CTA Case No. EB 1285)
- CTA Case No. 3385 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 3385)
- UNION BANK OF THE PHILIPPINES v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5623)
- BAP CREDIT BUREAU, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2095)
- NATIONAL FOOD AUTHORITY, Represented by Acting Regional Manager Felimon T. Cangrejo of NFA-ARMM v. MUNICIPALITY OF SHARIFF AGUAK, TREASURER OF SHARIFF AGUAK MAGUINDANAO AND MUNICIPAL ASSESSOR OF SHARIFF AGUAK MAGUINDANAO(CTA Case No. EB 2465)
- CTA Case No. 1756 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1756)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.