[ G.R. No. 4068. March 12, 1908 ]
[ G.R. No. 4068. March 12, 1908 ]
[ G.R. No. 4068. March 12, 1908 ]
UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. EMILIO ARANETA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
CARSON, J.:
ATTEMPTED RAPE.—From the Court of First Instance of Iloilo. Ho error prejudicial to the rights of the accused appearing in the records, the conclusions of the lower court held to be justified, and judgment affirmed.
Per Carson, J.
For appellant: Carlos Ledesma and Ramon Fernandez. For appellee: Attorney-General Araneta.
D E C I S I O N
The evidence of record sustains the findings and the judgment of conviction of the trial court, and we find no error in the proceeding prejudicial to the rights of the accused.
The judgment and sentence are therefore affirmed, with the costs of this instance against the appellant.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 13143. April 26, 1961 ](G.R. No. 13143)
- G.R. NO. 142941, June 26, 2006
- [ G.R. No. L-33093. December 29, 1975 ](160-A Phil. 1085; 72 OG 2768 (March 15, 1976))
- [ G.R. No. 130964. September 03, 1999 ](372 Phil. 563)
- [ G.R. No. 126996. February 15, 2000 ](382 Phil. 438)
- [ . January 30, 1934 ]
- [ G. R. No. 18175. July 31, 1962 ]
- G.R. No. 121769, November 22, 2000
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.