CTA Case No. 468 (Amended Decision)

et 1on � c�... c � - - . \t? - - .... .. X � .. ~� � IC \(\\ e d spo i i ion f o d c sion of Ju e � d 4 foll t .to 0 fil r- 1 � eg $ h ff1 nc 0 2. I !a 1- h f th '� - nr ffi n e. 11 � cy t f :r 4l' 2 y gc� h 0 i ch dy 1 0t y. n 394

/ , � - ... aI 1- f l t C � n � oei 1 fo-r u hin con � i c st 0 cu � po � X in n � p ct ih ii - af � o tic c u - d co 0 $ti a 0 � � u �c in ry lu i 5 1 CC' , �� on e o ... () it t fe 0 u of � he d - �J 0' po �� r i n0 it t- 1 that incu 0 - 1 i r' � � f tl in on t r ap ea in 0 0\J ci io � of J � 39 5

DI �� � - 3- It h xp .n �1 - to nte 1 ;ltio ... ton of J � � � l: l . i w (') i - 1� ct � ,.t po it! po ion four _ el- �1 31 �0 � fo ... 9, 396