CTA Case No. 2660 (Decision)
REl'tJRUC OF TU!t PHlLJPPfMU COURT 0 1 TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY -- c��� 2 c � c 1r i l � � l. n , 1 � o� jr � � it 602
- � 26 - 2- rth r ct 70 e 2: � tt t � 603
�- � 2 - 3- � t 1c r r lig - t � �
- .., . 2 - 4- j � 1- -i l i ri v � L- 2 9 7. c t ' 2, c cc � � 2. 1 ... � I l 'I Q l c � ' ti �n I l 0 c rit I f v c v � f .r: c n. .. I w tn r Itt n 1 605
- 2 - 1 is l � � 7) . - i i � � � :J d r - l � ti- ic 1 ol 1 606
-� 2 - � �t &. 1 75 � f ln 1 � �0 �1 � � � or � J � 3 � � l � 1 y ri j1 1. c t c 607
.... � - � 1 � � 608
� - 1 t in f. 1 ur ru rt 1- : 609
l ..-.1 c � 266 r �s ti r u c ur 1 �t 1 u f � so v net r � vr - � r � 0 � � � 0n 1 ne tc �� i � >. i n o. 0 � , , � r r- ti � � 610
� - 10 - � 611
� .I l � 0 c l- h X 1 Ol')t - po r . th r t 612
�2 2- � 1 1 ec� � ct. r � � L- 7 � J l 3 � 1 � � {) , t i .r �� �� II .6t3
c- �6 - ~ 614
-o. 2660 .. 1 sl t~� s 615
... ' �2 0 - 15 - I 616
�2 0 - 16 - u r � ~C � r r o. n �x� c ..:.l y t. ') I t J. �. C' �� rn �� " il -� .. � I ,.... 0 c cl 'C t. OP r .. h r. t 1d n c � J 0 � 617
� 2 60 - 7- nr � t 1 i � i � t fr � 1 � � r 1 r 11 - rt s u � 618
� 26 -1 r nc 1 to � ir � io � � i r� r i -� 1 "c tiv i of . i t or , i i rt -: r 1n l t ..i ti" .r W"" d i v � nt l. lt t~1C c �� i no # 1 c 11 ~ � .- f>, 1 n .r .'lU c t ic � � ~ Ltc � rr t c1 ort y t fo 0 trie .i t c c;. .x,. � 'I � r fl 0 c on ~ of t r l. 1 , Q ~ -s 11 � :c , fHl 0 r it 1 tn J r y i .i � � 619
-l - � � 1 '7 � �0 7
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.