CTA Case No. 4102 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY STATE FINANCING CENTER, INC., CTA CASE NO. 4102 Petitioner~ - VP.l"$1..1$ THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - X RE 6 0 L UT I 0 N in a manifestation and motion moves for the dismissal of the instant case with prejudice, pointing out its compliance with the compromise agreement it ent et~ed into with the Commissioner" of Intet~nal Hevenue r~eqt.dt~ing it to pay the amount of P329,265.95 in settlement of its documen�tat"'Y stamp tax liability ft~om 1977 up to 198;::::. As pt~oof, petitionet~ shows the compr~omise agreement, the of payment and the con f 1 t"'mat 1 on annexed to its motion. Respondent did not interpose any opposition to the aforesaid motion of petit1oner. The motion to dism1ss 1s 1n order. ACCORDINGLY, the Court Resolved to DISMISS the
RESOLUTION - CTA CASE NO. 4102 - 2- present case with prejudice and this case is deemed settled and terminated. SO ORDERED. Ql..t e z on Ci'b y, Metro Man i l a, J u 1 y 3 1, 19 9 Cl AMANTE Presiddi g Judge CONS � ~�-R--O-A--Q-UIN A sociate Judge
More in CTA Resolutions
- LINDE PHILIPPINES, INC. (formerly, CONSOLIDATED INDUSTRIAL GASES, INC.) v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8724)
- STEFANINI PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 10920)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. DAKUDAO & SONS, INCORPORATED(CTA Case No. EB 1150)
- IRISH FE N. AGUILAR and RUTH C. MANGROBANG v. HONORABLE KIM S.JACINTO-HENARES, in her capacity as COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2088)
- CANON INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES PHILS., INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7483)
- CTA Case No. 1443 (Resolution)(CTA Case No. 1443)
- LARRY E. SEGAYA/LES ENGINEERING AND CONSTRUCTION v. COMMISSIONER OF THE BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9875)
- IMA LAND HOLDINGS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9505)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.