CTA Case No. 5450 (Decision)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS (in its capacity as Trustee of various employee retirement funds>, Petit i onet~, C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DECISION This is a petition for review filed by petitioner, BANK OF THE PHILIPPINE ISLANDS <BPI) , successot~- in- interest of Citytrust Banking Corporation <Citytt~ust), trustee of the various employee retirement funds, against respondent COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, for the latter's inaction on petitioner's claim for refund in the amount of P7,066,426.32, allegedly representing the 20~ final withholding tax erroneously withheld from the i nt et~est income of the Retirement Funds for the year 1. 9'35. Petitioner is a banking corporation duly organized and existing under Philippine laws and is authorized to perform trust functions and other activities by the Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas <BSP). It is the surviving cot~pot~at ion in a met~get~ between BPI and Citytt~ust, who was the duly appointed trustee and investment manager of
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 2 various retirement funds ("Funds") and pt~ovident plans ("Plans") subject of this case, on Octo bet~ 4, 1995. Thus, petitioner~ BPI succeeds to all the rights and obligations of Citytt~ust, including those pertaining to the trust accounts involved in the instant case, in accordance with Section 80(5) of the Corporation Code of the Phi 1 i p pines, to wit : "Sec. 80. Errect s o t= lllet'get' o r consolidati on. The met~get~ m~ consolidation, as provided in the preceding sections, shall have the following effects:" XXX XXX XXX "5. The Stwviving m~ consolidated corporation shall be responsible and liable for all the liabilities and obligations of each of the constituent corporation in the same manner as if such surviving or consolidated corporation had itself incurred such liabilities or obligations; and any claim. action or proceeding pending by or against any such constituent corporations may be prosecuted by or against the surviving or consolidated cot~pot~ation, as the case may be. Neither~ the rights of creditors nor any lien upon the property of any of each constituent corporations shall be impaired by such merger or~ consolidation." (Under~scor~ing supplied) Dur~ing the year~ 1995, as trustee and investment manager~ of the various retirement plans, .in f't��a, invested funds in gover~nment securities and similar investments, from which the funds realized an aggregate interest income of P34,482,517.77. The said income was subjected by the BSP to the 20~ final withholding taxes under~ Section ;.=::1 (c) (1) in r�elation to
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 -3 Section 50(a) of the Tax Code; allegedly in the tota l amount of P7,066,426.32. On Septembe~~ 18, 1996, Cit yt ~~us t, filed with respondent a claim for refund or tax credit of the aforesaid amount of P7,066,426.32, on the ground that the withholding and collection of the 20% final tax from the income of the retirement funds was erroneous and/or illegal as the Funds are exempt from income tax pursuant to Republic Act No. 4917 i n relation to Section 53(b) of the Tax Code and Supreme Court decision in the case of Commissioner of Internal Revenue vs. Court of Appeals, The Court of Tax Appeals, GCL Retirement Plan, 207 SCRA 487, March 23, 1992, which upheld the exemption from income tax of income derived by qualified <tax exempt) retirement funds from bank deposits, money placements or purchase of bills and/o~~ government securities. The claim for refund in the amount of P7,066,426.32 is broken down as follows: T/A No. Account Na1e Inco1e Withholding Tax 18-004 Ateneo Eagle Fund p 44,952.04 p 8,994.57 18-005 Ateneo Scholarship Fund 131,499.88 25,778.95 18-007 Ateneo University Fund 216,909.24 47,943.90 18-017 Misoco1 23,221.31 4, 789.51 5C-001 Citibank Retire1ent Fund 132,273.60 26,690.91 SC-0018 Citibank Retire1ent Fund 385,970.85 80,107.06 5C-002 Citytrust Retire1ent and 386,459.59 78,116.77 Provident Fund 24,793.16 4,971.64 SC-003 Alcatel Trade Int'l. Phils. 577,826.06 115,671.85 5C-004 Singapore Airlines Ltd. 518.95 103.79 SC-007 Int'l. Flavors &Fragrances 5C-008 Atlas Copco (Phils., Inc. l/
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 - 4- Pneuaatic 17,942.65 3,597.29 11,847.48 5C-Q11 A1erican President Lines 58,213.17 38,142.54 4,929.28 5C-013 The Goodyear Tire &Rubber Co. 190,712.68 23,474.90 29,608.56 5C-015 Philtread Tire &Rubber Co. 24,646.39 7,243.44 5C-017 Mercury Drug Corporation 115,232.30 0.00 0.00 5C-Q18A Singer Sewing Machine Co. 147,574.01 89,621.40 35,913.72 5C-018B Singer Sewing Machine Co. 36,090.29 35,913.72 54,639.86 5C-019A MJO 0.00 2,194. 70 11,003.32 5C-019B North Negros Marketing 0.00 48,675.53 5C-Q20 Del Monte Phils., Inc. 438,629.44 2,951.06 8,283.84 5C-021B Del Monte Phils., Inc. 179,568.74 20,764.23 10,926.46 5C-025 Nestle Phils., Inc. 1,436,208.97 16,172.40 5C-028 Caltex Phils., Inc. 272,997.19 17,818.65 6,568.69 5C-029 Assoc. of Int'l. Shipping Lines 10,709.28 1,630, 772.71 363,249.07 5C-030 Dow Che1icals Pacific Ltd. 55,015.28 3,285, 701.15 5C-032 Catholic Educational 5,826.65 Association of the Phils. 236,749.40 4,422.06 1,440.40 5C-033 Royal Insurance Int'l. Ltd. 14,445.26 334.82 5C-Q35 Si1e Darby Int'l. Tire Co., Inc. 41,408.01 12,404.69 11,122.06 5C-036 Boehringer Ingelhei1 103,797.31 8,249.53 3,637.53 5C-037 J. Walter Tho1pson Co. 54,269.39 63,934.07 1,677.66 5C-Q38 Cagayan Electric Power &Light 10,254.11 2, 091.15 Co., Inc. <CEPALCOl 78,275.44 34,414.01 63,895.60 5C-041 Pfizer, Inc. 87,860.37 17,986.64 18,158.22 5C-042 Pacific Enaael &Glass Mfg. Corp. 32,660.72 12,119.35 5C-043 Petron Corporation 7,151,046.66 442.41 47,412.82 5C-043A PNOC Energy Dev't. Corp. 1, 754,531.44 3,658.59 7,570.20 5C-Q43F Phil. Nat'l. Oil Co. Shipping 37,273.49 &Transport Corp. 16,767,742.73 5C-044 SST Philippines, Inc. <Arico Marsteell 29,123.69 5C-Q50 Abb Stal Refrige, Inc. 21,913.12 5C-051A Manila Golf - Caddy Welfare 7,121.19 5C-051B Manila Golf &Country Club, Inc. Death or Per1anent 1,674.02 5C-Q52 Cyana1id 62,023.43 5C-053 He1isphere Leo Burnett, Inc. 55,585.31 5C-054 BASF 40,934.42 5C-060 Ad1iral Realty Co., Inc. 17,838.03 5C-061 INTEL Phi 1s. 312,095.01 5C-062 ECCP 8,383.91 5C-066 MIT Retire1ent Fund, Inc. 50,588.78 5C-068 Henkel Phils. 10,136.24 5C-069 Coca-Cola 156,850.78 5C-070 A1kor/Ana1 Pilipinas, Inc. 303,590.42 5C-072 Sharp, Phils. 88,655.63 5C-073 Colgate Pal1olive Phils., Inc. 93,833.38 5C-073C Colgate Pallo live Phils., Inc. 60,150.65 5C-Q73D Colgate Paholive Phils., Inc. 2,245.11 5C-074 FOSECO Phils., Inc. 236,949.04 5C-075 Malaysian Airlines 18,091.60 5C-076 Victory Liner 37,493.20 5C-Q81 Ault and Wiborg 184,828.18
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 - 5- SC-082 Wellco1e Phils., Inc. 35,269.60 7,344.44 2,533.32 5C-Q83 Japan Airlines 12,666.56 6,043.94 SC-085 Poblador, Azada &Associates 7,108. 84 1,164.88 Retire1ent Plan 30,153.22 747.11 5C-Q86 Phil. Belt Mfg. Corp. 35,362.96 362.35 732.46 5C-089 United Airlines Phils. Ret. Plan 5,824.40 2,605.30 1,624.48 SC-091 Blue Bell Co11odities 3, 716.62 40,935.21 476.88 5C-092 Drug Makers Laboratory, Inc. 1,802.88 9,568.73 1,027.31 SC-093 BP South East Asia Ltd. 3,662.32 486.46 486.46 5C-094 Asian Finance IC Ret. Plan 12,959.71 %7.51 2,030.64 SC-095 British Airways Ret. Plan 7,949.10 691.23 5,742.91 5C-O% US E1bassy FSN E1ployees Ret. Plan 204,036.99 7,160.30 SC-097 Vitacolor Industrial Ret. Plan 2,384.46 11,346.24 5C-098 Phil. Bus. for Social Progress 47,447.51 0.00 2,076.16 SC-100 ASEC Int'l. Inc. 4,950.08 5,811.62 2,426.42 5C-100B ASEC Info Syste1 2,431.16 234.41 5C-100B ASEC Info Syste1 2, 431.16 3,440.84 14,920.32 5C-102 E1irates 4,829.16 14,263.52 1,352. 06 5C-103 Zilog 10,104.80 2,970.11 3,593.27 5C-106 Urdaneta Villa Ass. Ret. 3,347.18 2,587. 79 2,143.61 SC-108 Ateneo de Davao 28,615.23 36,394.67 3,252.08 5C-110 Cyana1id Agricultural Research 7,525.23 3,578.33 Foundation, Inc. 35,801.51 2,425.61 5C-111 Xavier University 56,293.43 466.23 151.32 5C-111C Xavier University 0.00 7,344.50 1,550.31 5C-114A Wyatt Co. 10,380.81 802.31 1, 753.36 5C-114B Wyatt Co. 29,058.07 1,060.30 6,294.17 5C-114C Wyatt Co. 12,132.14 6,294.17 3,945.59 SC-115 The Senan Club 1,122.14 0.00 5C-116 Mfrs. Life Insurance Corp. 17,158.46 SC-117 Reftractories Corp. of the Phils. 73,476.59 5C-118 Bristol-Myers Squibb (Phils. l, Inc. 71,317.63 SC-121 AT &T 6,631.89 SC-122 Sacred Heart School 14,823.68 SC-124 C.C. Unson Co., Inc. Ret. Plan 17,949.44 5C-125 Golay Buche! Phils., Inc. 12,923.78 SC-127 IATA Agency Services 10,426.02 5C-129 Sunlife of Canada 181,413.11 SC-130 Yasaki-Torres Mfg. 15,900.14 5C-135 Akerlund 37,476.98 SC-137 Food Industries 17,712.05 5C-138 University Physicians Services 12,128.08 5C-142 Transfar� Auto Sales 2,331.19 5C-142B Transfar1 and Co., Inc. 756.62 5C-143 Ateneo de Naga 36,680.94 5C-147 Phil. Waterworks Corp. 7, 731.45 SC-148 Co1puter Prof., Inc. 4,011.62 5C-149 Prov. Fortune Ins. Corp. 8, 766.92 SC-150 INS Bank 8,301.50 5C-151 Philex Retire1ent Trust 31,470.83 SC-155 Philex Retire1ent Trust 31,470.83 5C-156 FMC Marine Colloids 19,688.88 SC-157 H.B. Fuller (Phils.l Inc. 0.00
DECISION - C. T. A. CASE NO. 5'+50 - 5- SC-161 Eveready Battery Co. 153,597.47 30,747.37 5C-162 Eastern Teleco1s SC-164 Raton Magsaysay 48,948.94 9,890.83 5C-165 The Asia Foundation 5C-175A Claret School 11,062.82 2,569.21 5C-175B Claret School 3, 722.89 788.15 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 TOTAL ?13414821517. 77 ?1710661426.32 The aforesaid claim for refund was not acted upon by respondent, hence, on Decem bet~ 23, 1995, petition et~, as successor-in-interest of Citytrust, filed with this Court the instant petition for review. Petitioner repleads its stance a quo in the instant petition and further pointed out that since each of the aforementioned trusts created by the retirement plans is registered with the BIR as a reasonable private benefit plan pm~suant to Section 28(b) (7) <A> of the 1995 Tax Code, as amended by Republic Act No. 4917, they clearly enjoy exemption from income tax, including the 20~ final withholding tax aforecited, thus, petitioner stressed that it is entitled to the refund of the 20~ final withholding tax erroneously deducted and withheld from the income of the above-mentioned retirement plans in the total amount of P/,066,426.32. On the othet~ hand, t~e spondent in his answet~ intel�~po~;ed, .intt:?r~ a.l.ia, that (1) the petition states no cause of action as it does not allege the date(s) when the tax sought to be refunded were actually paid, <2> Presidential Decree No. 1959 which took effect on October 15, 1984 withdrew the exemption from withholding taxes on
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 ��- 7 - interest income from bank deposits and yield from deposit substitutes and money market placements, and (3) it is incumbent upon petitioner to show that it is entitled to the refund demanded under Section 230 of the Tax Code. The issue to be resolved by the Court is whether or not the interest income of the retirement funds, are exempt from withholding taxes, thus, petitione~~ as trustee of the various retirement funds abovementioned is entitled to the refund of the amount representing the 20% final withholding tax erroneously withheld and collected by respondent from the income earned by the funds ft~om its investments in government securities and s i milar undertakings. This is not the first time that we have been confronted with such an issue at hand. stated by petitioner, the matter was already settled by the Supreme Court in the case of Comm i ss i o n er of I nt ernal Rev en u e vs. The Honorable Cour t of Appea l s , et a l ., G.R. No. 950 22, March 2 3 , 1992. The Highest Court ruled in that case that an employees' maintained by an employer to provide retirement, pension, disability and death benefits to its employees and which has been approved and qualified as exempt from income tax by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in accordance with RA No. -4�917, is exempt ft~om income tax, including the 20% final withholding tax imposed on intet~est eat~ned on
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 -- 8 - Philippine currency bank deposits and yield from deposit substitutes, thus: "The~~e can be no denying eithe~~ that the final withholding tax is collected from income in respect of which employees' trusts are decla~~ed exempt <Sec. 56[bJ, now 53[bJ, Tax Code). The application of the withholding system to interest on bank deposits or yield from deposit substitutes is essentially to maximize and expedite the collection of income taxes by requiring its payment at the source. If an employees' trust like the GCL enjoys a tax-exempt status from incom e , we see no logic in withholdin g a certain perc entag e of that income which it is not supposed to pay in the fi~��st place." <Unde~~sco~~ing supplied). in accordance with the above ruling of the Honorable Supreme Court which is in conformity with the provisions of RA 4917 <Section 1) and Section 53(b) of the Tax Code, quoted hereunder, this Court finds that the withholding of the 20% final withholding tax from the income of the Funds was without legal basis, and hence, was illegally and/or erroneously collected. "SECTION 1. Any pl�~ovision of law to the contrary notwithstanding, the retirement benefits received by officials and employees of private firms, whether individual or corporate, in acco1�~dance with a ~~~~easonable pt~ivate benefit plan" maintained by the employe~~ shall be exempt from all taxes and shall not be liable to attachment, garnishment, levy or seizures by or under any legal or equitable p~~ocess what soeve~~ x >< x. " <Emphasis supplied) "Section 53. Imposition oF tax. (a) ~pplicatian oF tax. The tax imposed by this Title upon individuals shall apply to income of
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 - 9- estates or of any kind of property held in tt~ust, including - X X X (b) Exception The tax imposed by this Title shall not apply to employee's trust which forms part of a pension, stock bonus or profitable sharing plan of an employer for the benefit o�f some m~ all of his employees x x x" (Underscoring supplied) The legal issue having been settled, what r~emains to be resolved by the Court as of the moment involves factual matters, that is whether or not petitioner has established by evidence its claim for refund. In substantiating its claimed refundable amount, petition et~ formally offered exhibits A to G-329, inclusive of submarkings, and the testimonies of its witnesses. Respondent did not object to the admission of petit i onet~' s exhibits neither~ did he submit any documentary evidence to suppor�t his case. Thus, cons idet~i ng the unc ont t~o v er~t ed evidence of the petitioner, the Court was persuaded to extend the relief sought by the petitioner but only to the amount of P5,559,574.35, as the Court after a minutiose scrutiny of the evidence presented including those which the Court took judicial not ice of, finds that some of the retirement funds (enumerated below) were not specifically qualified and certified as tax exempt by the BIR and one of them failed to offer proof of withholding tax
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 - 10 - payments. Acc(:wd i ng 1y, the Court excluded the following from the computation of the allowable refund, thus: a) Those with retirement plans which have not been specifically qualified and certified as tax-exempt by the BIR in accordance with RA 4917. Account Nate Withholding Tax 18-004 Ateneo Eagle Fund p 44,952.04 p 8,994.57 25,778.95 18-005 Ateneo Scholarship Fund 131,499.88 47,943.90 4, 789.51 18-007 Ateneo University Fund 216,909.24 2,605.30 1B-Q17 Misocot 23,221.31 967.51 11,346.24 5C--o94 Asian Finance IC Ret. Plan 12,959. 71 2,076.16 5,811.62 5C-102 Etirates 4,829.16 2,426.42 5C-111 Xavier University 56,293.43 234.41 3,440.84 5C-114A Wyatt Co. 10,380.81 14,920.32 14,263.52 5C-1148 Wyatt Co. 29,058.07 1,352.06 3,578.33 5C-114C Wyatt Co. 12, 132.14 2,425.61 5C-115 The Gertan Club 1, 122.14 46f..23 151.32 5C-116 Mfrs. Life Insurance Corp. 17,158.46 7,344.50 1,0t.0.30 5C-117 Reftractories Corp. of the Phils. 73,476.59 2,569.21 788.15 5C-118 Bristol-Myers Squibb (Phils. l, Inc. 71,317.63 2,363.47 5C-121 AT & T 6,631.89 5C-137 Food Industries 17,712.05 5C-138 University Physicians Services 12,128.08 5C-142 Transfart Auto Sales 2,331.19 5C-142B Transfarm and Co., Inc. 756.62 5C-143 Ateneo de Naga 36,680.94 5C-150 ING Bank 8,301.50 5C-164 Raton Magsaysay 11,062.82 5C-165 The Asia Foundation 3, 722.89 5C-170 Ciba Geigy Phils. 11,588.91 b) Those with retirement plans which were previously disqualified in CTA cases 4807 and 5083 involving the same petitioner and same legal issues: T/A No. Account Nate Incote Withholding Tax 5C-044 Artco Marsteel p 29,123.69 p 5,826.65 5C-050 Abb Stal Refrige, Inc. 21,913.12 4,422.06 5C-089 United Airlines 5,824.40 1, 164.88 5C-098 Phil. Bus. for Social Progress 47,447.51 9,568. 73 5C-108 Ateneo de Davao 28,615.23 5, 742.91
DECISION - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 - 11 - c) Retirement fund which did not offer proof of withholding tax payments. T/A No. Account Na1e Inco1e Withholding Tax p 31,470.83 p 6,294.17 5C-151 Philex Retire1ent Trust With respect to the remaining retirement funds of other companies which were not excluded, a close scrutiny of the evidence presented by petitioner reveals that not all of the withholding tax payments mentioned in the summary were properly substantiated by source documents such as Confirmation of Sale and Fixed Income Securities Placements. In conclusion, only the amount of P5,559,574.35 should be granted to petitioner. WHEREFORE, the instant petition for review is partially GRANTED. Respondent is hereby ordered to refund or issue a tax credit certificate to petitioner, as trustee of the various retirement funds, the sum of P5,559,574.35, representing the 20% final withholding tax proven to be erroneously withheld from the interest income of said retirement funds for the year 1995. No costs. SO ORDERED.
DECISION - - 12 - C.T.A. CASE NO. 5450 WE CONCUR: P esiding Judge ~ '-- ~ RAMON 0. DE V RA Associate J1 ge I I CERTIFICATION I hereby certify that the above decision was reached after due consultation with the members of the Court of Tax Appeals in accordance with Section 13, Article VIII of the Constitution. L a_v~ ERNESTO D. ACOSTA Pr~esiding Judge
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.