[ G. R. No. 37933. May 24, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 37933. May 24, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 37933
[ G. R. No. 37933. May 24, 1934 ]
INOCENCIO PAYUMO, APPLICANT AND APPELLANT, VS. FELIPE BUENCAMINO JR. ET AL., OPPOSITORS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________8th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of ___________Nueva Ecija ________, dated the __________26th__________ day of _________February____________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby , affirmed in all its parts, with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that ___________appellees__________ recover from __________appellants__________the sum of P__40.00___, as cost.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 124050. June 19, 1997 ](340 Phil. 545)
- G.R. No. 244001, June 23, 2021
- [ G.R. No. 166895. January 24, 2007 ](541 Phil. 482; 103 OG No. 43, 6875 (October 22, 2007))
- [ G. R. No. L-9416. August 31, 1956 ]
- [ A.M. No. P-02-1534. March 26, 2003 ](447 Phil. 609)
- [ A.M. No. 392. July 31, 1975 ](160 Phil. 553; 72 OG 4458 (April, 1976))
- [ G.R. No. 187317. April 11, 2013 ](709 Phil. 236)
- [ G.R. No. 190389. April 19, 2017 ](809 Phil. 106)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.