cta_resolution CTA Case No. 156156 1959-10-26

CTA Case No. 156 (Resolution)

C

RRPUBLIC OR CQURT OF MANILA THF TAX PHILIPPINE APPEALS

SWS CRIENTAL CCHERCIAL COHPANY. Petitionet.

I- vezsus C.T.A. CASE NC. 156

REVENUE . THe CCLIECI CF Nospondant. INTERAL 6EI 6H 7B,15SF (0120159

RESOLUTIGN

Tms petitioner, on Cctober i. 19b9, filod a motica

praying for withdrawal ot ito Petition fcr ievtew cod the

exhtbit. attached thereto on the ground that the above

entitled caoe hed been anicably tuttled with tho Ccanio*

Sioner of Internal Rovenuo.

Qn tto day oet for the hearing ot the said moticn.

neither the reapondent nar hit Counsel appeared. I

peu tiouer prosontod s photostat cepy of the lottor of

tm Ceniesioner of Internal Revenue dated march ll.

1959 and oddressed to Mr. Frod Knecht, a/e 3wiss Criontal

Couaercial Co.. 99 Daamariaas, Manila, quoted bolcw

seased against tme Swiss Criental Commor- P47,C06.72, I havs the honer to iafora you determined that the Swias Criental Caamr- er cial Co. for the year l950 in the amount of that upon further invostigation of thls caso cial Co. did not accumlate in l95o n cur- egainst the osi conpany is hereby cangelled and our demand therefor mithdran. and roconsideration of th roaoons statad in your several lettors this Cifice has plus beyend its reascnahle neods. Ia viaw theroof..the aeoomont for 47,c06.7 7. l997 relative to the z5A ourtax ao- SIn reply to yeux letter datad Novam-

f your appeal in C.T.A. Ce No.136, yom Srou the Court of Tax Appeals. CrA res. My now withdraw ywr patition for review "Inasmuch os this case io the subject

1 37

RESCLUTICN C.T.A.CASE NO. se

D, 53. I VreN cF Thg FeeGonie, and findiny tho aotion

well takan, the Potition for Reviow is heoeby dinmissed,

Tm Cierk of Court io ordered to return to tm poti-

tioner the exhibit (Annex A) attached to t Potltion

for aeviow upan propor roeetpt therofar. #ithout Drc-

nouncenont os to cooto.

SO CRDERED

Manila, Cetober 26. 1959.

Presidins Judge

WE CONCUR

wocIate Judge CA

AGAN L Associate Judge IMALI

138

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.