[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
CA No. 43
[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
GALICANO HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. FRANCISCO CALZADO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
GALICANO HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. FRANCISCO CALZADO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
SALE WITH RIGHT OF REPURCHASE; RELATED ATTEMPT TO REPURCHASE.—Plaintiff filed a complaint praying that defendants be required to re-sell to him the land in question in accordance with their contract with right of repurchase. Defendants answered that plaintiff's right to repurchase had already expired. Held: The evidence shows that plaintiff belatedly attempted to make the repurchase.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.