[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
CA No. 43
[ CA No. 43. May 31, 1947 ]
GALICANO HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. FRANCISCO CALZADO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
D E C I S I O N
GALICANO HERNANDEZ, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLANT, VS. FRANCISCO CALZADO, ET AL., DEFENDANTS AND APPELLEES.
SALE WITH RIGHT OF REPURCHASE; RELATED ATTEMPT TO REPURCHASE.—Plaintiff filed a complaint praying that defendants be required to re-sell to him the land in question in accordance with their contract with right of repurchase. Defendants answered that plaintiff's right to repurchase had already expired. Held: The evidence shows that plaintiff belatedly attempted to make the repurchase.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 234457. May 12, 2021 ](903 Phil. 174)
- [ G.R. No. L-39025. October 31, 1984 ](218 Phil. 27)
- [ G.R. No. 195203 [Formerly UDK No. 14435]. April 20, 2015 ](758 Phil. 375)
- A.M. No. P-99-1342 (FORMERLY OCA IPI NO. 97-344-P), September 20, 2005
- [ G.R. No. 9869. March 25, 1915 ](G.R. No. 9869)
- [ G.R. No. 213607. January 25, 2016 ](779 Phil. 136)
- G.R. No. 166408, October 06, 2008
- G.R. No. 186496, August 27, 2009
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.