CTA Case No. 1939 (Decision)
'.Ef"UBUC O.P THR PHILIPPINE:. COURT OF TAX � PPE.Al8 QUEZON CITY �1 . 1 .� � '1 , ..
1? � 1 � � '(1 : ~ 9 ) '
� i~ 10
I::t �x .,. o. 9)9 et ,) tltloo .r .a�~ 1 the l . ~~!.it� of . ll 1trtpotdt!, n. o tJ � niatratl: (; � l!' � lt 1 r .u t ~ �a el r-1 ~ 1 � ~ tted lf\ good fa!t in ttl! p.t!of'.IU Uo or th. >ro\1 d t nt., tl � $ r-1 n d tb ct w: c ~rilH th def ct~ ot" fault ' a:pp,~a.rtng in th0 o.rt inal ' , .t1 .f n r that tl e iiab Utr of � th fl� :s� l fo~ �u � ry:t.rl� lnmant.fo t~tl c~rao . wa out�~d !.lr obli t �r t~:i � tl..;r~ ~~r.e'ndr:en� of the , t4t'* idl a' pp 4'!\d, t)y th pr p . ~ to . ~th-: 1ti $ . h1 1 aot t.~ � .. :t thCl :.t!;l~ of ~ . QM~ 1 ~. �� l'l.Yt~ lrJ � ~ -- Co mitH~iOMX' ot Custo ' c .~. 'n C~tte l!o. 1930,-- ~e -�1 bflr c.?i~, 1.,..i""'t whi . 11: clViH1 e. 1 til 1 a,~ , hJ.~ co~ rt b�l �
.. � 0 !' ' 12
� 1 r . �� l.t - ~~ 13 '
� � 1 71 1' !' 14
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.