CTA Case No. 1840 (Resolution)
T ' o. l8lto L I0 Th.i , r l to pon ent t . ot n to . i . - ti 1 n tor r f aa Oll' t t . 1?.! 1nh ritanc � 1t1on r, a co-e cutor t: of � c. t an l' t nc x r urn ro th th 1 o �n urn, h 1h 1 .. oun d t 283 1 2. 93 , r p e 1 l,y, or l or ' 1+94-'84-7.9; � 2ll,30S'. .( � 4 6-.~ ol . 2; .I�� . ). f't .r 1nv � 1- 1 , t . po se t th t th o al ount t n inh rit ne (p �� - e ") , which s � � �� ' ..t r ). t 42~.253 � 5 , 1 clu p 1 1e ( p. 68~ cu.trix, N eita
0 Ot IO o-. 18lt. CA~ c� un ot 2 ,253 . S.$ <. � 68~ ol. 2 , . I.� � e.). tb: of" r po�- 0 t xee . tr c rti 1 t ot. 1 t .r er on 1� 11 - b1l1 1 ceo � ne 1tb. c 1 97 of T Cod � D1 1 1 tb r1 n,t u nc o t c rt1f1 e t 0 di c t on r til d with his our a ti- ion n� on n a f'il a otio tb end p 1 1o fo.sr l c J ri 1c � on. ( ectton l l of Repu c � 112 u hor1.e y r on, c1 t1on or corpo:r tio dv �r .ly a.r- f ct d c1 io r u 1 . ot b Coll cor (now C ion r) of l o pp l to t~1 � r he b n int. rpr t w o � p cuni ry int r r re g to ry pr jUJ 1c d by th .rulin , or er or dee:l io. n na c in olvi a oeu � C1 of orth d ms, l9o s � 29C.; 82 N rth � ern eporte 46). In h 11 ht t t 1 u nc , b l v th 1 h r p t 1on r I . �v, ir or t e sta i a r ly ft ct d by r spond nt�s eo! ion an , th :r - nY r n t 0 t 0 uthoriz y 1 ~ p. 1 0 ne Co f T 1 p l .) T Ul.l P ym t r e Vi d s . b.1cb is l th n h or h :X ir � r turn, to the 1 ...
l 40 , � """'3 ... t e o ot X1 d 1. ted' t> s n.ot t t wh1 h . cu.ni �7 t1 io 1 th of i f.h p 1t 1o r o nt~ r � th . t in i f! tp 1 1 n th r 1 r juri dtc - d pr n :l ' s t in no, t U. 1t1 n ' t up f th t. 'this t v 'I'Y j,J ott11 a � t s d in 1 at 0 ow p dn ' pond ' ot1~n to 1 ho p on y t 196 � i' ,, 8 6
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.