CTA Case No. 288 (Decision)
~- - , ' K~PUBLTC OP' TJtF. PHILIPPINES COURf OF 1 A.X lU!.PEA.l.J) M.ANll..A � � 1tion�~ la.~l .. - r u ~ 10\ � 4. � . 28 X� ~ � � � � ~ � � � � ~ I 0 � pea f o t d - on of the v� f or ton Cl t .o.r. I tio pu 1 c ct o. 141 � l� � . 1 ' ni a var �cle � �� II r .uf... ~cons a t ��d s crt appr ' l s h ch � 0 ice a � o pe� cue fl .1- r�ater po lon o s ~as or t1t1oner but �d tificat_o \. ol t. epublic c ft r n� 0 � except 7 le a of re over n y the � � ated arc 27, l9 6 . pon p 1, th a 209 :..~,
L' .. 2 - 2- J.a WI by the t.- ay to. 1 ~6. , ,.. the l att ttl� � lti u ftled t in ant � 1 trlal and a ant to i � e..lu on o c tl :rt � " 1) NJ:Jtr 19 , 1 :,) t n, ~h� ..!aed ~tlclet �er� sola t p lie ct! t of lch ale t � tu of ~. 2. w.t real r d aepoalted wlth tne S.�t c�!pte ot. ?29 �no 7" �- anua.ry 2 , 19!)7. he ooda r�l sed t p t�tl n tallt4 low d elu s: -�- -- .. --.. .. ... 2 � 222 tbe Ooda which were ae!a and forfeited t the ov..,..nt lcb contt1tute the ~Jtct attar of 210
� 288 -- ap~al ~� �� f llow�: a) 1, � � � �nu uate ove. 0 � n 11 ( tens o f nd ou ht by t�t on fr on kong �lle .1y 0 tion and f elittl' t!on to h.ta �� � ivea and rtencta ts � elea of ��1d � '" � c) .,W.l � c t :reaid�nt, u u t . o-c ll. no-doller-s- tt asia. th n four (~) ona f l lld ue � ollec ~0 st en la 1�- 110 � �t th t ey t �0 �n l us on � � �� � they fo c purp����� al y J.a � ..... � only �� � her� conce ns forfeit&ae o .a k loa of � lt lon � ahark' r . �� pze erv ve t bl��� ~l �� ec t!ons l. {c) and f epu 1 c o. 1 1 , 211
� - 4. 1". . � �� 1t t eo 11 e en t (n 1 re- es!d c~ of - ore , 0 1 ll p � � � t. 0 � the v 1 nvo v � ��� reel en t � oodo:~ "d 0 X� � . ~ 212
G. r�� -. t t\ f Qftel.. .8 f!eh, ied. f ! n� � ! sou pre er~ veg t bl � � fru n 4. to � ;j s ifi nt er w 1 e,. l � � o not only 1 1 c) h� yea:r of o.ttfl :tor&f at. ro g t for rcial pur ���� of the pr vt l e ant u r of H public a o. l-41 � � � ( � 1 f. ppe h itlon r a r a i n 1 5, h � trip 10 c . �� � u �� ' y of f. on �h � s, e i n c er 0 h r � . he tion., " r n ppl c ole o e evto u1c c ua s �� � provl o eonta n d 1n ~ c ion � o. eit a oner r !a the �l ht queat1on 1n their � (' h ou y uor o �~ ial purp eonten d n ehalf Ptt!tione:r ou h or 1� � x: 1 tiv s or o ua OQ of � !l ou Q o ht. for c;c;lllau�c;tal pu.r:p ���� cc w:-.E'td tn y r .. 213 �
E � 2U ... 6 - .1 i o. r us o ... .., id th Coil c or of s , � � 0 h t ! 1 ly e .. pend n h~s t 1 t t h ou d n ur h n t ! >: tons th l: nt tn y f or ! s r~on 1 con u ~tion i f ly t f or dl tr1 ut1on el t v��� .c t d 0 t t at a po.r on d 0d ~1 er' � !l:'OU t b , h h elat1ves. .) ven .r ht h 0 ~~ ng ~ ly or a
� - 7 .. f" 1 ~ 1Q ' 1 ta , h 1 p r ~t on than 11 - 0 tt ff n oth r rt1cl 1 t any one .. � he no-doll _,.. ltt ne and n UG of th"' pr � 1� ndoubt v1ltge con li' 1n1 ( ) t .tc; t!t . I . r � 1 of � tc:l t . �v no ti in e ~o . ,��1 � th� � f. it co ta � �tn�� p t.ttf.on � � in� � y� � 957. ani � - � 215
More in CTA Decisions
- PRUDENTIALIFE PLANS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 1219)
- PHILIPPINE MINING DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE and THE OIC-ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, LARGE TAXPAYERS SERVICE, in their official capacities as officers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. 9292)
- LANTRO PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2406)
- STAEDLER (PHILIPPINES), INC. v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8431)
- ALPHA RIGGING & MOVING SYSTEMS, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8135)
- ERNST & YOUNG GLOBAL CLIENT CONSULTING ASIA PACIFIC, BV v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6223)
- BISAZZA PHILIPPINES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 9372)
- CE CASECNAN WATER AND ENERGY COMPANY, INC. v. THE MUNICIPALITY OF ALFONSO CASTA?EDA, AND JERRY P. PASIGIAN, JR. AND JENNIFER M. TIONGSON, IN THEIR RESPECTIVE CAPACITIES AS MAYOR AND TREASURER (OIC) OF THE MUNICIPALITY OF ALFONSO CASTA?EDA(CTA Case No. EB 2494)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.