sec_commission_decision SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144 Sanglaan Loan Company Incorporated, Enforcement and Prosecution Department (now the Enforcement and Investor Protection Department PetitionerSEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144 Sanglaan Loan Company Incorporated, Enforcement and Prosecution Department (now the Enforcement and Investor Protection Department Petitioner

SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144 Sanglaan Loan Company Incorporated, Enforcement and Prosecution Department (now the Enforcement and Investor Protection Department Petitioner

Republic of the Philippines

SEC Building, EDSA, Greenhills, Mandaluyong City Securities and Exchange Commission Department of Finance Commission En Banc

In the Matter of:

SANGLAAN LOAN COMPANY, INCORPORATED,

SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144

ENFORCEMENT AND PROSECUTION DEPARTMENT PROTECTION DEPARTMENT), ENFORCEMENT AND (now INVESTOR Petitioner. the

X

DECISION

now the Enforcement and Investor Protection Department (EIPD), against SANGLAAN 2012 by the then Enforcement and Prosecution Department (EPD) of this Commission. LOAN COMPANY, INC. (SANGLAAN LOAN) Certificate of Incorporation and Imposition of Fines) (Petition)1 filed on 22 February Pending consideration by the Commission is the Petition (for Revocation of

under SEC Registration No. 0000166581 on 1 August 1989.2 Its primary purpose is "to intangible properties x x x."3 MONEY or EXTENDING LOANS on the security of real or personal, tangible or act as a LENDING INVESTOR or, otherwise to engage in the practice of LENDING SANGLAAN LOAN is a stock corporation duly registered with the Commission

Corporate Governance and Finance Department (CGFD), issued a letter informing LOAN was directed to show cause why it should not be liable for violation of the Lending Company Regulation Act of 2007 (LCRA) or Republic Act No. 9474.4 SANGLAAN LOAN that it has not secured a secondary license or Certificate of Authority (CA) to Operate as a Lending Company from the Commission. SANGLAAN On 20 October 2009, the then Corporation Finance Department (CFD), now the

2 Id., Annex "A" (Certificate of Incorporation of SANGLAAN LOAN). 3Id., Annex "B" (Second Article of the Articles of Incorporation of SANGLAAN LOAN) 4 Id., pars. 8 and 9; and Annex "F" (Show Cause Letter of the CFD dated 20 October 2009). 1 Petition dated 21 February 2012.

Page 2 of 4 SANGLAAN LOAN COMPANY INC. SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144

SANGLAAN LOAN was ordered to obtain the required CA, otherwise, the CFD will continuously fails to secure the required CA in violation of the LCRA. In which case, refer the matter to the EPD for the latter's appropriate action.5 On 20 January 2010, the CFD issued an Order stating that SANGLAAN LOAN

Thereafter, the EPD issued notices of conferences directing the officers/directors of SANGLAAN LOAN to appear at the Commission to clarify matters relative to the business operations/activities thereof. Atty. Lionell Macababbad, who is the representative/counsel of SANGLAAN LOAN, appeared at various conferences before Macababbad responded that SANGLAAN LOAN already stopped its operations but will comply with the requirement for the CA. Thus, Atty. Macababbad requested for additional time or until 8 November 2011 to comply with the requirements for the CA.6 the investigating team of the EPD and was informed of the required CA. However, Atty On 30 November 2010, the matter was thereafter endorsed to the EPD

failed to settle the administrative penalty and secure the required CA.7 LOAN to pay the administrative penalty in the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php EPD alleges that, to date, SANGLAAN LOAN, despite its receipt of the Order, still 50,000.00) for failing to secure the required CA in violation of the LCRA. However, the On 5 October 2011, the Commission issued an order directing SANGLAAN

the revocation of the Certificate of Registration of SANGLAAN LOAN for failing to secure the required CA in violation the LCRA. Hence, this instant Petition was filed on 22 February 2012 by the EPD praying for

its principal office address, and to Miguel A. Tambunting, who is its president, ordering 2012, SANGLAAN LOAN and Mr. Tambunting, were served the Summons. them to enter their appearance in the case and file their Answer to the Petition within fifteen (15) days from receipt thereof. The Summons states that failure to file their Answer to the Petition within the above-mentioned period may result in a judgment by default in favor of the petitioners and reliefs applied for may be granted.8 On 12 March On 7 March 2012, the Commission issued a Summons to SANGLAAN LOAN at

Answer within the fifteen (15) day period mandated in the Summons and the Section 3-11 of Rule III, 2006 Rules of Procedure of Commission (Rules).9 The effect of the failure to file an Answer is provided under Section 3-12 of Rule III, to wit: However, SANGLAAN LOAN has not entered its appearance nor filed its

% Id., pars. 17-18; and Annex "K(Assessment Letter of the Commission dated 5 October 2011) 5 Id., par. 10; and Annex "G" (SEC-CFD Order No. 053, series of 2010 dated 20 January 2010). 8 Summons dated 7 March 2012. 6 Id., pars. 12-16; and Annex "J" (Minutes of the Conference held on 16 September 2011). 9 Section 3-11, Rule III of the Rules provides:

"SEC. 3-11. Answer -- Within fifteen (15) days from the service of summons, the respondent shall file his answer to the complaint x x x'

SANGLAANLOAN COMPANY INC

Page 3 of 4 SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144

parte additional evidence." (Emphasis ours) complainant such relief as the complaint may warrant, unless the Hearing stated period, he shall be considered as in default. The Hearing Panel, or Officer shall, motu proprio, proceed to render judgment granting the Panel or Officer determines the complainant should be required to submit ex "If the respondent FAILS TO ANSWER the complaint within the above-

Commission is constrained to render a judgment based on evidence and records thereof. Considering that SANGLAAN LOAN failed to file its Answer to the Petition, the

business of a lending company without securing the required CA in violation of the SANGLAAN LOAN by the former. Clearly, SANGLAAN LOAN was engaged in the LCRA and its Implementing Rules and Regulations (IRR). Records of the Commission show that no secondary license was issued to

A lending company is defined under Section 3(a) of the LCRA as a corporation engaged in granting loans from its own capital funds or from funds sourced from not

lending company. more than nineteen (19) persons. Clearly, SANGLAAN LOAN was organized as a SANGLAAN LOAN is "to act as a LENDING INVESTOR or, otherwise to engage in the practice of LENDING MONEY or EXTENDING LOANS on the security of real or Under its Articles of Incorporation, the primary purpose of

personal, tangible or intangible properties x x x"

As a lending company, SANGLAAN LOAN is required under Section 4 of the LCRA to secure the required CA.10 To obtain a CA, SANGLAAN LOAN is mandated under Section 5 of the LCRA to comply with the minimum capitalization of Php

2007.11 However, no CA was issued by the Commission as stated in the Certificate of 1,000,000.00 within three (3) years from the effectivity of R.A. 9474 which took effect

Corporate Filing/Information,12 which warranted the EPD to order SANGLAAN LOAN to pay administrative penalty in the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php 50,000.00) pursuant to Section 12(1) of the LCRA.

procure the required CA, and to pay the penalty in the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos lawful order of the Commission. The EPD gave SANGLAAN LOAN an opportunity to pursuant to Section 6(l)(3) of P.D. 902-A for its refusal to comply or defiance of any Further, the Certificate of Registration of SANGLAAN LOAN must be revoked

10 Section 4 of the LCRA provides that no lending company shall conduct business unless granted an 11 Section 5 of the LCRA and Rule 4(a), subparagraph (i) of the IRR. 12Certificate of Corporate Filing/Information issued"by the Company Registration and Monitoring authority to operate by the Commission.As a result of which, Rule 3(a) (i) of the IRR requires lending companies to secure the required CA. Department on 4 March 2016.

Page 4 of 4 SEC Administrative Case No. 02-12-144 SANGLAAN LOAN COMPANY INC

SANGLAAN LOAN failed to comply with such lawful order, thus, warranting the revocation of its Certification of Registration. (Php 50,000.00) pursuant to Section 12(1) of the LCRA. However, as above-stated.

Certificate of Incorporation and Imposition of Fines) is hereby GRANTED against Certificate of Authority to Operate as a Lending Company, and for refusal to comply Presidential Decree No. 902-A, in relation to Sections 4 and 5 of the Lending Company COMPANY INCORPORATED is ordered to pay the administrative penalty in the amount of Fifty Thousand Pesos (Php 50,000.00) pursuant to Section 12(1) of the LCRA SANGLAAN LOAN COMPANY INCORPORATED, for failing to secure the required with or defiance of the lawful order of the Commission pursuant to Section 6(l)(3) of Regulation Act of 2007 or Republic Act No. 9474. Further, for its failing to secure the required Certificate of Authority to Operate as a Lending Company, SANGLAAN LOAN WHEREFORE, premises considered, the instant Petition (for Revocation of

Department and the Economic Research and Information Department for their information and appropriate action. Let a copy of this Order be furnished the Company Registration and Monitoring

SO ORDERED

Mandaluyong City, 31 May 2016.

TERESITA J. HERBOSA*

Chairperson

ANTONIETA F. IBE MANT ne Commissioner

W

EPHYRO LUIS B. AMATONG Commissioner BLAS JAMES G. VITERBO * Commissioner

*On Leave

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.