CTA Case No. 303 (Decision)
� c. r.A. � r us � � - - - - - . - .. )(� - - .... DE . ,e t 1t on r 9 r r \.; op ar 4.- n in oc1at1o � c., i. � ent 0 ser ita;.r& rc lo trct up f tf - rikan, � I � 0 1' CJl t. 1 of or t . ol n � � Kin dot ~i ha.r: nd � � in of t . r- � lan ~ t utf n 'ta lev col l ct on �.iJ tlar fert1l i .: r "'Ol nd � ever 1 t.n or xpo � tr 1n que t 0 ere not subJ ci; to t ti 4, t rn v t X to t ,. � I�et itio r up n in t r 0 () or eu t . a purpo e � to the r cn t. X � value o t 00 0 � port tions. n s ntr declarations fi e y Oi� hh -Cl' ����� house , the ent� of the cnrxespondin ttes ted re ade . Het\Ce. the.r as a s ased on the 356 L.v
� � ,2 - f t1& � 5 valor d ty prov1 or � in par iX''P 72� a o hili J.n ct of 1� n � n '" t � to al ount and t h x-epresent!n h v lu of h ~onsu ption t � at he e �t s ~ ti � s� ����� ~ � hip n of t rt 11% ra, u 1 r ote& d custo s dut 1 � n the u nov tot 1 un of 1 , 277 . ~ c r d tt d t no thoula no 0 c::; v oodo ;v:>r fo:r p rp 1c � Ina uc p t it1o. :r: I1 y the oll t o t f 1i 0 pon ent \.#OO � t tf.on r tt p tlti he etis on nd ount o h o lv not e ou x, eo 1 y t � overn t o rtil � z r 0 J.th1n lta territory. ut f. a n t c l l t on to n �h �� clu � part uti le val e 1n t of the tlea when �atd rchand �� i - ~t� I t�t�Cl 1n J.aple ter � at to the 111 f.nea . � ������ t of t � t � ~orrec a lt � euatoms ut1es on t e porte fertUiura .ln que � t.lon? 357
� . ... { T .c contro eray in the tu at b cent� & on th� !nttrp~etation that e ould give to ule 1 (a} of U.t U1 .tn leriff c of � en e � reads a fo lo ' eatto b fore u3 haa alre dy "rely .c: d y the pre tt Court tn the ca of oriental la al ace va. The Insular Collector of Cuatoms ( hll , ). ~r� pr eisely, !n t � word f tt upre � Court , ~ht dec1siv ��tion solve in said paid on tht er~hand se 1n quea� tton, the �~crt valut of 2, 11. 3, or tht ome con- ption value !n Germany of . ~~ . 96?� ... fter ttlltin ~ tha\ �th� ant r rea s to tn ule 13 (�) of th 111pp! r r ff ct of 1 , � uprt curt conclude 1 � l~haut atratning t t letter of the law a lt stands, � reach the obvioua con- '� olus on that the amount ef , 254 96 (the h c onawap ion value 1n zwany 1 the
- � s -~ v luo . .. In th .ow:t c t d ith a val the ol in ot th Unit d t t � u C rt 1n t � c ee of u. o . ve . ass vent , 16 , � � 16� n- ere o:it o th opini 1 and a h 1 th fr)J:' t a ess~ne nt of ~ cust s ut � t � o:.rt n qu s- 359
- � -� t t� � valu h Ian X or ha 0 c: l nln - co 1 ( 1 �. J) (n 0 1a ov y �ctu y � ev f ot ) th n r� on XC � r r t t 0 � �� �� nter 1n In e � al or 0 � �� y va ly 0 � in th t value u ut � 1� 360
' � 303 �� a alnat petittone � lla, 111ppinea, ly � 1 7. ---
More in CTA Decisions
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. MIRANT (PHILIPPINES) OPERATIONS, CORP.(CTA Case No. EB 123)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. CE LUZON GEOTHERMAL POWER COMPANY, INC.,(CTA Case No. EB 554)
- CTA Case No. 5330 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5330)
- MIRANT (PHILS.) MOBILE CORPORATION [formerly SOUTHERN ENERGY MOBILE, INC.] v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 5935)
- CTA Case No. 17242 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 17242)
- CTA Case No. 4810 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4810)
- GST-PHILIPPINES INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 7133)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. SECURITY BANK CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 274)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.