CTA Case No. 3364 (Resolution)
kf:l'll"3t.Ir O.f '1 U::. PUILIPPINr'v COURT OF T~~ APPEALS ~'''~7o~ cn-v LETICIA MAiifALAC, P tition r , - versu C. T . A. C~S E O. 3364 COHlvl i SS I ONER OF I.t J ERNAL REV ENUE, H pondent. S0L TI 0N Acting o petitioner� s "Motion to �~ itbdraw Fetitionq filed o uly � 19 2 on the round that th t x liability involv d in this cas h s alre dy b n tt t h ru comp romise with ~h pay- ment of P1,497 . 39 to thE\! reau o lnt rn 1 R venue as evi enoed by � avenue Tax .. c i p t No . /;.9375526 dat d June 4, 19 2 and confi by Centr 1 B nk Con!irmation RecEtipt ~.;o. A102B466 3 is ue � on th m t , an t ere being no o j cti n on th part of respo dent , the sai tt~tion is h reby GR4NTED . / coordin ly, let the petition �or r view b deemed wit r wn n th above-en~itl d cas con- id r: clo e and tenninated . u u ~on City, Netro u nil , uly 12 , 19 2 . 1 r-: { 'LI .
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.