CTA Case No. O-5 (Resolution)
REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES Court ofTax App eals QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION PEOPLE OF THE PHILIPPINES, C.T.A. CRIM. CASE NO. 0-005 Plaintiff, For: Non-Filing of Income Tax -versus- Return DANTE T. TAN, Members: A ccused. CASTANEDA, JR., Chairman UY, and PALANCA-ENRIQUEZ, JJ. Promulgated : JUL 27 2005~~~~ X ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ X RESOLUTION Accused Dante T. Tan is charged before this Court with the crime ofNon-filing of Income Tax Return under an Information which reads as fo llows: " I NFO R MATI O N The undersigned State Prosecutor, Department of Justice, hereby accuses Dante T. Tan of non-payment of capital gains taxes punished under Section 255 of the National Internal Revenue Code committed, as follows: 'On or about 15 April 1998 up to the present, within the jurisdiction of the Honorable Court, the accused, a registered taxpayer with Taxpayer Identification Number 132-620-617, did then and there willfully and unlawfully
C.T.A. CRIM. CASE NO. 0-005 2 RESOLUTION refuse and fail to file his income tax return for the taxable year 1997. CONTRARY TO LAW." In this regard, Section 7(b) ofR.A. No. 9282 provides: "Section 7. Section 7 of the same Act is hereby amended to read as follows: 'Section 7. Jurisdiction. - The CTA shall exercise: (a) X X X involving (b) Jurisdiction over cases criminal offenses as herein provided: ' (1) Exclusive original jurisdiction over all criminal offenses arising from violations of the National Internal Revenue Code or Tariff and Customs Code and other laws administered by the Bureau of Internal Revenue or the Bureau of Customs: Provided, however, That offenses or felonies mentioned in this paragraph where the principal amount of taxes and fees, exclusive of charges and penalties, claimed is less than One million pesos (P1,000,000.00) or where there is no specified amount claimed shall be tried by the regular Courts and the jurisdiction of the CTA shall be appellate. xxx."' A perusal of the allegations of the Information shows that the accused is being charged for Non-Filing of Income Tax Return, without any specified amount of the tax being claimed. Pursuant to the
C.T.A. CRIM. CASE NO. 0-005 3 RESOLUTION aforequoted provision, it is clear that this case falls within the exclusive original jurisdiction of the regular courts, and the jurisdiction of this Court shall be appellate. The Court, therefore, is left with no recourse but to dismiss the case for lack ofjurisdiction. Furthermore, the Court also notes that while the caption of the Information shows that the accused is charged with the crime of Non- Filing of Income Tax Return, the first paragraph of the Information, however, accuses Dante T. Tan of non-payment of capital gains taxes. WHEREFORE, for lack of jurisdiction, the case in caption 1s hereby DISMISSED, without prejudice to filing the same in the proper forum . SO ORDERED. ~i'�C1.~l ~. @ANITO C. CASTANEDAV'JR. Associate Justice . ~1~~'Q) OLGA PALANCA-iNRIQUEZ Associate Justice
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.