[ G. R. No. 39123. June 06, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39123. June 06, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39123
[ G. R. No. 39123. June 06, 1934 ]
FELIX JASENA ETC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. THE MUNICIPALITY OF VICTORIAS ET AL., DEFENDANTS, ABELARDO SUAREZ, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________19th________day of ________May________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of __________Negros Occidental__________, dated the__________28th______________ day of __________October_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-two____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with the costs of this instance agaainst the defendant-appellant.
It is further ordered that the __________the plaintiff-appellee_________ from the __________the defendant-appellant _________ the sum of P_ 40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. L-41278. April 15, 1988 ](243 Phil. 355)
- G.R. No. 226103, January 24, 2018
- [ G.R. No. 117010. April 18, 1997 ](338 Phil. 338)
- A.M. NO. RTJ-02-1735, April 27, 2007
- G.R. No. 119225, July 26, 1996
- [ G.R. No. 106646. June 30, 1993 ](295 Phil. 1070)
- [ G.R. No. 217044. January 16, 2019 ](845 Phil. 801)
- [ G. R. No. 14018. August 31, 1959 ]
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.