cta_resolution CTA Case No. 1095310953 2023-01-19

ERS SURPLUS VENTURE, claimant, Shipment of 1x40 Container with No. TEMU743840 STC: Used Parts and Components for Replacement under Import Entry No. C-12566, covered by BL No. SITYKCD2114311 on board the vessel SITC KANTO/21165, which arrived at the Subport of Mindanao Container Terminal, Tagoloan, Misamis Oriental vs. REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES

REPUBLIC OF THE PHILIPPINES COURT OF TAX APPEALS QUEZON CITY SECOND DIVISION ERS SURPLUS VENTURE, CTA CASE NO . 10953 claimant, SHIPMENT OF Members: 1x40 CONTAINER WITH UY, Chairperson, BACORRO-VILLENA, and NO. TEMU743840 STC: CUI-DAVID, JJ. USED PARTS AND COMPONENTS FOR REPLACEMENT UNDER IMPORT ENTRY NO. C- 12566, COVERED BY BL NO. SITYKCD2114311 ON BOARD THE VESSEL SITC KANT0/21165, WHICH ARBTVED AT THE SUBPORT OF MINDANAO CONTAINER TERMINAL, TAGOLOAN, MISAMIS ORIENTAL, Petitioner, -versus- REPUBLIC OF THE Promu lgated: PHILIPPINES, JAN 1 9 ZOZ3 'f:}f~ Respondent. X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -/ - X RESOLUTION On November 29, 2022, the Court received petitioner's Manifestation cum Clarificatory Motion (Manifestation) filed through registered mail on November 14, 2022, stating that it received the Court's Resolution dated September 1, 2022 directing it to rectify the noted discrep ancies in its Petition for Review and to submit the judicial affidavits of its intended witnesses within ten (10) days from notice , on November 3, 2022. Petitioner asks for clarification on whether the said submission is indispensable given that the proceedings before

RESOLUTION CTA Case No. 10953 ERS Surplus Venture, claimant, Shipment of 1x40 Container with No. TEMU743840 STC: Used Parts and Components for Replacement under Import Entry No. C-12566, Covered by BL No. SITYKCD2114311 On Board Th e Vessel SITC KANT0 / 21165, which arrived at the Subport of Mindanao Container Terminal, Tagoloan, Misamis Oriental vs. Republic of the Philippines x------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------x the Customs District Collector comprised only of submission of position papers. Petitioner further manifests that if the Court considers the submission of testimonial evidence indispensable in resolving this appeal, petitioner prays that it be given an extension of 10 days to submit the judicial affidavit/ s of its witness/ es. Under Section 6 , Rule 7 of A.M No . 19-10-20-SC 1 or the 2019 Proposed Amendments to the 1997 Rules of Civil Procedure, which the Court En Bane adopted in Resolution No. 9-2020,2 petitioner must attach in its Petition for Review the judicial affidavits of its intended witnesses. WHEREFORE, petitioner's Manifestation cum Clarificatory Motion filed within the given period3 is NOTED and GRANTED . Petitioner is DIRECTED anew to submit the judicial affidavits of its intended witnesses within a non-extendible period of ten (10) days from receipt of this resolution. Thereafter, the Court shall act accordingly. Meanwhile, the Resolution dated October 28, 2022, dismissing the instant case for petitioner's failure to comply with the Rules and order of this Court, is RECALLED and SET ASIDE. SO ORDERED. {On Leave) ERLINDA P. UY t . Associate Justice MA~~~O-VILLENA JEAN z;2;;c~ate Justice },yAMdltl~ 8.' LiNE':E cui-DAVID Associate Justice 1 SEC. 6. Contents. -Every pleadi ng stating a party's claims or defenses shall, in addition to those mandated by Section 2, Rule 7, state the following: (a) Names of witnesses who will be presented to prove a party's claim or defense; (b) Summary of the witnesses' intended testimonies, provided that the judicial affidavits of said witnesses shall be attached to the pleading and form an integral part thereof. Only witnesses whose judicial affidavits are attached to the plc<tding shall he presented hy the parties during tri<tl. Except if 1t pHrty presents meritorious reasons as basis for the admission of additional witnesses, no other witness or affidavit shall be heard or admitted by the court; and (c) Documentary and object evidence in support of the allegations contained in the pleading. 2 Took effect on August 7, 2020. 3 The tenth day, November 13, 2022, fell on a Sunday. lienee, the Manifestation was timely fi led on November 14, 2022.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.