CTA Case No. 3100 (Resolution)
&"PUBLIC 0� ll!E i'lliUPI>I"<)':;,; COU&r OF TAX. APP�.4L.S -~OJ'M' CIT'IHANK N. A. , Pet.i t:-ione�Jr:, C. 'T.' . A. CAS>E', NO. 3~10 0 THE', AC.TI~G: COMMISSIONER OF INTBRNAL RE:VENUE, 1 Re� s;pon<dle~n t . - ~ - - - - - - - - - - - - ~ RE S 0 LUT I 0 N I t. appear.incgj that~ pe~t~i 1r:.ioner in tbe abo~e:- its; appe~al t �o 1this Court. as; indicated[ in the 11 Mot~ion To Wi th<dlr:aw Pe:t .i t~on F01r: Re"iW�ievlf'' file:<ll on Novre:mbei": lS 1 198 2 1 andl 1the:Jf:e~ be:incgj no obj e:c:tion o n 1t-he. part�- of Jr:e:s;ponde:n it.; The: Court�. Jfeoolwe:s;1 as: p1r:aye:di for, t.o <gjr ant. s a i dl mot~ on. Let�. 1i::he. petition :for� re:vie:w be: cons;ider:e:d. Wli t:h<dlrawn and t �h is; ~:as;e: deeme.'Gi c:lose:d. and! term ina 1t:.e:d.. Que�zon Ci t.y, Metr:o Manila, Nowre:mbe.r 26>, 1982.
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.