CTA Case No. 2182 (Decision)
'i~I"'U ~t.lC OF THE PHILIPPl.NKa COURT OF TAX APPE.4.UJ QUEZON mn ... � .o � . c.._ OI :� f 31 �
i':. . c -2' i t '\tl .it:iJt .� I r�l.... r , J ~. l se a~ t 1.ha ;1 a���,. c ~:,. es . � -p .r� . .I' � I, 1~ 'u - ~1 '132
- 0 2. �'-' " b. thf.f s 3 � l~ 1. t 'Ce~ ! ( ) n 11 pt. .f..�. tt ....., I<! 1. 1~ 1 '1 ;.; i � -*i:i ... ..<..' c) ' .u r ' l.o~. th \.I.Uject ra L � ..::.:: ->.1.;1. J.J.� v ....r .i. ' .�iC.� .L~ ::s (1: 1c ce I u . ;; I bu c.r��� o.�: 1 0 jU. 8 'il 1 r c. .~.. . Cl' s ... ...., tel:ts t;r� ... l a c e 133
coi 1 �. ti!, ;u f et l t 0 p- io . e J. . lQ. b ' c �t 1 ~ ' 1 a tu- a ty o. lG;* . I t s~ 1 � clat� d by pet1t � ' ner t At y , a'"' cla1Q.e ) u - P r graph � .., t ut� .. ts s t ~' . i- tially a �U.nw:.. Cl.ll. 1 ' ~d u �e r 1 tu~a ... u~ h o ~ r nuL �rt ~ , �uri.ri .tmt r . r s '.ao � r t ..Le et- .o.Ll J p ,. a tt" Ctt. l l / .L ey r 1 lly 4110 e lc: ts, t~lw t t~'l .:-~~ ar sr:1u 1 tt 0 VOle ~ .I..inn f 4 1ca 1 t u. l i ct .r1 l e ' .r. z tL t all . ;~
t "" nl ., r ~ c . as Ol r-ic u o~� that c l til!. '' f,tc t e J�iJ.'f "�o.. is _o 'tO ;:; n .....~ th e rt c 4 ' L '.t- . BL<i'- �o..., is�" ou rul .a 1 � :.�ticles ') ' n pt lll � ~e:;t. ..r i..i Ol.l:/ (- �tu. t ' . ) ln '.".".. :.Lti .e.r the OJ~ ,...f.' "tt e. ' e(,;r. a i.�y r JuO#ticc ' ~u oru ry 13 ) ..,f '� o ' Ct.. ct s ~ot.1. w: I' sec ticn l '1U s.cu u b� c,. . ssit1 .. nlt -,1.0 t:rlp _ 7 � Ut'-p ra r _p �� ll t J �, � .' I" Vl'� c':... . <.a:urt ' .....,......,...~_ ..,.t Ulty i ' b $! vti L� t 1e Q inicn ~ of ttl , worth Jl"l .1... ~ of tH,tic 1 io1.. IU e:t !JCCt e n � 31� ( ) o:t. t.hi:l :;: �.~J�� f � nd c he I a lu u �le le ~ ti. . e t S J . t . l ill . ;;;; du i r e;> a(.;/.1G �e t ion. 14-vt t1_. Cod ... to 1 ru:u ci GSi ';/ tsl,;1cles . t a o;_;ecro ,, 13 5
6 i.ha 1' 4 l i it 0. 22 !l X 5''J � j rt. r c l' ls net $ y mentl- { 0. i l~ ' th - tt o~ .ii, 60 1 lJl j ( 'Ctl1! .... ar v.� . rti l i (! ..' .. . ti J. upo . .p 1:. t 0 ....t. J.l ~ oral tu . l 1u~� l l uic t " y ttl 1 f' Co DSit.J � 1. ro 0 eet 'tl ~ . cl f C't;i. the f tu arr c t. t.~e lu. n sla b,y p ti ivi:rJ 8 oulu iJI:. appr .. l st.i all . e J.1H \ � 'I -. v.3 , a w an h J ~.:r~ , ~ 't~l. ' p no. . c 136
- v� 'I I: era u 0 e l. i :u r ~i) {.A ri a 't !;tUL �. 0, nt .t ~ a �t a t, n t.l St..ld � .~ �t.l .... t.i;.; �a '� o...~ v '' e~ o.. ~ �i ul., t l~?l � i' 137
More in CTA Decisions
- PHILIPPINE AMUSEMENT AND GAMING CORPORATION v. THE COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE AND THE HEAD REVENUE EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT, LARGE TAXPAYER SERVICE, in their official capacities as officers of the Bureau of Internal Revenue(CTA Case No. EB 869)
- PLACER DOME TECHNICAL SERVICES (PHILIPPINES) INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 6106)
- CTA Case No. 111 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 111)
- COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE v. PANAY POWER CORPORATION(CTA Case No. EB 2911)
- PRIMELINE PRODUCTS PHILIPPINES, INC., As represented by LCB LEO B. PILAPIL by Virtue of a Special Power of Authority duly Executed by the company thru their Board ofDirectors v. Hon. ALBERTO D. LINA COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS(CTA Case No. EB 2275)
- PERCEPTION GAMING, INC., v. BUREAU OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. 8509)
- CTA Case No. 5938 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5938)
- CTA Case No. 5617 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5617)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.