jurisprudence[ G.R. No. L-92. May 25, 1946 ] 1946-05-25

[ G.R. No. L-92. May 25, 1946 ]

[ G.R. No. L-92. May 25, 1946 ]

G.R. No. L-92

[ G.R. No. L-92. May 25, 1946 ]

FILOMENA CORTEY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ELISA GAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT. ROSARIO GUARDIAN, INTERVENOR AND APPELLEE.

D E C I S I O N

FILOMENA CORTEY, PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE, VS. ELISA GAN, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT. ROSARIO GUARDIAN, INTERVENOR AND APPELLEE.

FURNITURE, OWNERSHIP OF PIECES OF.—As there is nothing in the evidence or elsewhere in the record upon which the Court can disturb the findings and conclusions of the trial court, which saw, heard and observed the witnesses testify, and judged their respective credibility, and finding said judgment in accordance with the facts and the law, the same is hereby affirmed.

Want an analysis of this document?

Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.