CTA Case No. 1267 (Decision)
THE UNITED ST TES LIFE INSUR NCE COMP NY IN THE CITY OF HE\v YORK , Petitioner, - versus - C. T�� CASE NO . 1267 COMHISSIONER OFINTERNAL REVENUE , Respondent . X- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - X DECI S I 0 N This is an appeal by the petitioner from the res - pondent ' s demand for the payment of i>300o00 as "compro- mise penalty" for alleged violation of Section 4- of the Bookkeeping Regulations (Revenue Regulations No o V- 1 , as amended) in relation to Section 352 of the National Internal Revenue Code o Petitioner is a corporation organized and exist- ing under the laws of the State of New York and licensed to do life insurance business in the Philippines . On February 20, 1958 , petitioner wrote a letter to the Col- lector (now Commissioner) of Internal Revenue certify- ing the number of loose- leaf sheets used in its cash receipts and general ledger for the year l957o As the number of loose- leaf sheets used did not tally with that stated in the certification and that petitioner failed to have the certification under oath, respondent sug- gested that petitioner pay a "compromise penalty" in the amount of P6oo . oo in extra- judicial settlement of its penal liability under Section 352 of the Revenue Code . The discrepancy was explained by peti~ioner and res - pendent agreed to reduce the alleged penalty to P300o00 . 40
� - � , � 1' � � � ' � � � / 09
� l ~ ,. -
1 ' . � � ) � t 'u y� � r � c l c. � 1. 1 ' � � -1 t . 1 ) c f 411
�1 � � 2� ... � ... . . 412
More in CTA Decisions
- UCPB PROPERTIES, INC. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 568)
- PROCTER & GAMBLE ASIA PTE LTD v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE(CTA Case No. EB 2301)
- PROVINCIAL GOVERNMENT OF CAGAYAN Represented by: MS. EMILIA L. IRINGAN, Asst. Provincial Treasurer, OIC - Office of The Provincial Treasurer v. NATIONAL TRANSMISSION CORP. (TRANSCO)(CTA Case No. OC-013)
- CTA Case No. 1820 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 1820)
- CTA Case No. 2616 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 2616)
- CTA Case No. 6176 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 6176)
- CTA Case No. 4783 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 4783)
- CTA Case No. 5255 (Decision)(CTA Case No. 5255)
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.