CTA Case No. 1038 (Resolution)
( or Cus o C o. 17 � ~ranil Prot � lo9) (F C 17' / anila � es No~ . 17 i1a Prot st 0� ?0 - 16) 221 2 262 I os. 264 m ( "o 282 co �� to Ca I ( or ila o t to 209- 9) F I. s- I 1 er � vers � � .A. A ' NO. l � X- � � � � � � � � � - X " 18 3
.. 2- TI L T OC CO., (For Customs C s s os. 350 o 365., a ila Protes � os. 206�1 to 206�16) PI E �.urur..-v CO � 1 I � 1 ( or C st oma C s e s 66 Petit ioners, to 4 6 nil Prot st a o � 216- 1 to 21 � 7; 216...29 t 0 216-31 i 216-JJ to 216� 67) - ver us - c. r�� CA o. 1041 ELE E IO P P. s, as Co - miss ioner of C tom , n PED 0 P I t ct 1ng Coll <:tor of' Cust s, apon e s. X � � � � - � � � � � - .. � � X E 0 I.. U r I rh s ! s in con ction with the fl otio to Dis- miss t petition for r v fll in th a OV tw ntitl d c ases. I t ppe ring fr t e pl dings submitt by t e p rtie a t h th p t i t ion r a in th bov - nt1tl c s sh ul h ve filed p r t n p l s ; nd It app r - furt h r t t only .t.:::-=wo.::::.--10~.�._ t sts. �na 1y, P ot at o. 159 (Custo s C s o. 173) n ntla Protest � 16 (Cu to C se o. 17�) r Ci on th rits y the r spon t i ss ion r of Customs. an t h t th re so1ut1o s of t Co ission r of C to s on the other protests ar m rely 1nter1 ocutary ord r s n ther fore not ppea1a le to this Court; 184
I .., C � � A. 0 � 10 11 -. y 0 � th " o ion to Di mi Jl iled y th e pond n i her y rante , nd the pe - tio s for r ie i c were fil in the ove two n itled c; a h reby l sm1~ ed. 9 & 16. 1961. 185
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.