CTA Case No. 2231 (Decision)
t'Pl :\IEB I � � f t ~ 1~ I t A ~~- J }~ t f.Jd 'Jt � ,.-zn � 1 �' � ' ., .. ., on r, ... c .~:� ...a. - .., � �� � j j, ..:. ..., n t r -e r ) ~0 l ..h t. 1 1<.! 1 n 14, ' cu . ue., r 1 e �31 t 19 8 .. r i ue 't ri tt <!' \ r d� mt � 0 J.., ,4~l . ~d n ~.l l ti.... ' �... � .,~.. .-l" e l. ,., 't'+ }� ,J ll t u h t ... .,. ' ( ) o.� t. e ae�r.ant.e ,.... d4'i, ~lot l i epubJ.i .c � t "" . t �r. , ~the. ~ l C O!" u ~ ( c \ ) . J. ...:, 0 ai l;; �..u ' l , l~o ... 'h l~ x i 1 ... �,e it l 2 69
!J~.>. .l.~ l.vt~ ... C'J.' i �i.: At:~i::. :P~l, . 22.Jl ..:r ene:ral 1 \t to dt ontrnry . I t in tlld ad o behalf r petit1orer tbat �r1uer Hapi.i<hl1 4et v!o . 72 , as amen � � it. is fro nll t "::-c , &I.. t nat .3 t.i .n Ztt( ) or tbe .t e en~� Co e , as a.mendtr b SecQUon l o� .i.'IJepu~llo .ro �� th~ tn.~ � b1 l t y th � i t e~e p i on tro ' : ... L � �� t. sb �~.ll J al.":i cei(,.> nf) or t u �y l aft 1 June 3 �, l v 1.ne e � co � c . . n l,t . ~tev� ., r. � 27 0
,. "l .I ,. - :L �,1s.... 11"" . ,~Jl 3 .. .~ .1. T.. J.1 ln � � ., .l.. . . .J� ' .. !; p 2 t l971t; ' � ut I t . h .. , ... I .,. � � ~�� ..;; 1l tiv1 to Q e . led 1ts ' .;, u :f' nee 1 ic A�"t l' � - � l... .. . Ci t 271
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.