[ G. R. No. 39698. June 01, 1934 ]
[ G. R. No. 39698. June 01, 1934 ]
G. R. No. 39698
[ G. R. No. 39698. June 01, 1934 ]
SCHMID & OBERLY, INC., PLAINTIFF AND APPELLEE VS. MARIANO EZPELETA, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANT.
D E C I S I O N
J. STEVENS-ACTING CLERK OF COURT
This court having regularly acquired jurisdiction for the trial of the above-entitled cause submitted by both parties for decision,after consideration thereof by the Court upon the record, its decision and order for the judgment having been filed on the ________16th________day of ________June________, A. D. nineteen hundred and _________thirty-four________;
By virtue thereof it is hereby adjudged and decreed that the order of the Court of the First Instance of _________Iloilo__________, dated the__________21st______________ day of __________March_________, nineteen hundred and ___________thirty-three____________, and from which the above-entitled appeal was taken, be, and the same is hereby, affirmed with costs against the appellant.
It is further ordered that __________the appellee__________ recover from __________the appellant__________ the sum of P__40.00__, as costs.
More in SC Decisions
- [ G.R. No. 73521. January 05, 1994 ](299 Phil. 116)
- [ G.R. No. 27498[1]. September 20, 1927 ](G.R. No. 27498)
- G.R. No. 262632, June 05, 2024
- [ G.R. Nos. 75005-06. February 15, 1990 ](261 Phil. 429; 87 OG No. 24, 3290 (June 17, 1991))
- [ G.R. No. 239000. November 05, 2018 ](842 Phil. 719)
- [ G.R. No. L-30052. April 18, 1969 ](137 Phil. 581)
- [ G.R. No. 127367. May 03, 1999 ](366 Phil. 321)
- G.R. No. 109800, March 12, 1996
Want an analysis of this document?
Ask ASG Legal AI to summarize it, compare it with other rulings, or explain how it applies to your situation — it researches from this same library.